The Acer Predator Triton 300 offers portability and decent performance for general use and gaming, being lightweight and having a smaller screen size. However, the ASUS ROG Strix G16, while heavier and less portable, delivers better performance, particularly for 3D work, machine learning, and more demanding engineering tasks. It also has longer battery life, a slightly larger screen with a higher resolution and refresh rate, and improved color space coverage, which is better for creative work. Both laptops are similarly priced and come with equivalent storage and RAM, so if you prioritize performance and battery life over portability, the ASUS is the better choice. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer Predator Triton 300
Good portability
Advantages of the ASUS ROG Strix G16
Very good for engineering and design
Good battery life
Very good speakers
Key differences
Gaming and AI
7.1/10
7.9/10
6.5/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
8.5/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1200
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
165Hz
Yes
SUPPORTS DLSS
Yes
No
MUX SWITCH / ADVANCED OPTIMUS
Yes
7.5/10
FAN NOISE SCORE
7.2/10
The ASUS ROG Strix G16 and Acer Predator Triton 300 are both good for gaming and AI, though the ASUS ROG Strix G16 is somewhat better.
The Acer Predator Triton 300 is favored for gaming and 3D applications because it has a strong graphics card and a high screen refresh rate, which is essential for smooth visuals in fast-paced games. Similarly, the ASUS ROG Strix G16 also excels in these areas with an even more powerful graphics card and a higher refresh rate, which provides an edge for gamers seeking fluid motion and detailed graphics.
Engineering and Design
7.5/10
8.3/10
7.4/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.6/10
6.5/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
8.5/10
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
The ASUS ROG Strix G16 is very good for engineering and design, while the Acer Predator Triton 300 is good.
The ASUS ROG Strix G16 is very good for engineering and design because it features a newer CPU and a more powerful GPU than the Acer Predator Triton 300, enhancing its ability to handle demanding tasks, as well as a higher resolution and screen aspect ratio which can be beneficial for design work. While both laptops are equipped with sufficient RAM and quality IPS displays, the Triton 300 is lighter and more portable, but the Strix G16 counters with a significantly superior CPU and GPU, which justifies its heavier weight and potentially makes it a better fit for more intensive engineering and design use.
Content Creation
7.3/10
7.9/10
7.4/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.6/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1200
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
The ASUS ROG Strix G16 and Acer Predator Triton 300 are both good for content creation, though the ASUS ROG Strix G16 is somewhat better.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
7.1/10
7.7/10
7.4/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.6/10
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1200
7.5/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
7.5/10
The ASUS ROG Strix G16 and Acer Predator Triton 300 are both good for software development, though the ASUS ROG Strix G16 is somewhat better.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Screen Quality
7.3/10
7.5/10
15.6in
SIZE
16.0in
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1200
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
165Hz
294.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
291.0 nits
The ASUS ROG Strix G16 has a better screen than the Acer Predator Triton 300 for general use, gaming and AI, engineering and design, content creation, and software development.
When considering a laptop for general use, both the Acer Predator Triton 300 and the ASUS ROG Strix G16 offer displays that feature adequate resolution and brightness, making them suitable for everyday tasks like browsing and video streaming. For engineering and design applications, both laptops' screens can reproduce a wide range of colors, essential for precision in visual work, but despite this, their screens lack the optimal quality required by high-end gaming and 3D rendering, which prioritize higher refresh rates for smoother visuals; refresh rates that both models do not sufficiently provide.
Battery
5.5 Hours
9.0 Hours
The Acer Predator Triton 300 has 5.5 hours of battery life. The ASUS ROG Strix G16 has 9 hours of battery life.
Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.
Portability
Good
Fair
15.6in
SIZE
16.0in
4.4 lbs
WEIGHT
5.5 lbs
0.7in
THICKNESS
1.0in
The Acer Predator Triton 300 has good portability, while the ASUS ROG Strix G16 has only fair portability.
The most portable laptops are small, thin, and light.
Cost
$1,150
$1,375
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
The Acer Predator Triton 300 has a price of $1,150 and the ASUS ROG Strix G16 costs $1,375.
The ASUS ROG Strix G16 and Acer Predator Triton 300 are both good for general use.
The Acer Predator Triton 300 offers solid general use capabilities with a fairly light design and respectable screen quality but provides a moderate battery life, while the ASUS ROG Strix G16 provides a larger, higher-resolution screen with longevity in battery life, though it is less portable due to higher weight. Both laptops are equipped with high-performing CPUs and ample RAM, making them good for a range of tasks, but the better heat management and speaker quality of the ASUS could be appealing despite its slightly bulkier form factor.
Build Quality
7.6/10
7.8/10
The ASUS ROG Strix G16 and Acer Predator Triton 300 both have good build quality.
PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Acer Predator Triton 300 and the ASUS ROG Strix G16 compare to other laptops
"In our particular review configuration, the Acer Predator Triton 300 turned out to be a fairly powerful gaming notebook. Both CPU and GPU performance were at a high level, and the aluminum case turned out to be fairly robust. Only the display lid could have been a bit more robust. For customers on a budget that do not mind tinkering with the device’s fan management the Acer Predator Triton 300 can be worth a closer look."
"With the mobile Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080, the Asus ROG Stix G16 hits the sweet spot between performance and cooling. The G16 also does not have to shy away from direct comparison with its supposedly stronger family member, the ROG Strix Scar 18 with its RTX 4090, as most benchmarks of the two laptops are very close to each other. Moreover, the G16 should be significantly cheaper. Depending on the supplier, the price difference here could be almost US$ 2,000. In the 2023 model series, Asus has significantly leveled out the differences between the two high-end lines."
Get a great deal on the Acer Predator Triton 300 or the ASUS ROG Strix G16
About Acer
Acer is a prominent Taiwanese electronics brand which makes a wide range of laptops, with multiple product lines catering to personal use, gaming, and business use. They are renowned for having exceptional value for money, as they frequently offer good specifications at a lower price than other manufacturers.
About ASUS
ASUS, a Taiwanese electronics brand, is one of the largest personal computer vendor by market share. The majority of their laptops are targeted towards personal use or gaming. Their most popular product lines include the budget-friendly VivoBook, more premium ZenBook, and their TUF and ROG gaming laptops, the latter of which has a reputation for excellent gaming performance.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
111,795
Recommendations made
24,223
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.