The LG QNED90 is generally more expensive than the LG NANO90, but it offers better overall picture quality and performance in both dark and bright rooms. It's a better choice for movies and videos due to higher contrast and brightness scores. For gaming, both TVs perform well, but the QNED90 is slightly better, although the difference may not be significant for casual gamers. If you're on a tighter budget and need a TV that's still good for various content types and viewing environments, the NANO90 could serve you well, saving you money while delivering a satisfactory viewing experience. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG NANO90 (LCD)
Very good reflections
Advantages of the LG QNED90 (LCD)
Good for bright room
Good for dark room
Very good for news, talk, & other TV
Good for cartoons & animation
Good viewing angle
Key differences
Picture Quality
6.1/10
7.3/10
5.28/10
CONTRAST
5.60/10
6.6/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
7.4/10
LED FALD
PANEL TYPE
LED FALD
IPS
PANEL SUB-TYPE
IPS
The LG QNED90 (LCD) has good picture quality, while the LG NANO90 (LCD) has only fair picture quality.
Movies & TV
5.6/10
6.8/10
5.28/10
CONTRAST
5.60/10
5.3/10
BLACK UNIFORMITY
5.3/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
7.5/10
Yes
HDR10 SUPPORT
Yes
No
HDR10+ SUPPORT
No
Yes
DOLBY VISION SUPPORT
Yes
The LG QNED90 (LCD) is only fair for movies & TV, while the LG NANO90 (LCD) is poor.
Cartoons & Animation
5.6/10
7.6/10
6.5/10
COLOR GAMUT SCORE
7.8/10
6.6/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
7.4/10
7.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.7/10
4.3/10
COLORS OUT OF THE BOX SCORE
7.6/10
5.9/10
GRAY UNIFORMITY
5.8/10
The LG QNED90 (LCD) is good for cartoons & animation, while the LG NANO90 (LCD) is poor.
The LG NANO90 struggles with cartoons and animation due to poor colors out of the box and only a fair color gamut, which affects how vibrant and varied the colors appear. In contrast, the LG QNED90 is favorable for this content because it offers good color reproduction out of the box and maintains a good color gamut and volume, presenting cartoons with more accurate and diverse colors.
News, Talk, & Other TV
6.4/10
8.0/10
7.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.7/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
7.5/10
The LG QNED90 (LCD) is very good for news, talk, & other TV, while the LG NANO90 (LCD) is only fair.
The LG QNED90 tends to display content with better brightness in standard definition, which is key for news and talk shows, and it also provides more accurate colors right out of the box compared to the LG NANO90, enhancing the overall viewing experience for these types of programs.
Bright Room
6.9/10
7.7/10
6.3/10
VIEWING ANGLE
7.7/10
7.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.7/10
7.2/10
HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.3/10
8.0/10
REFLECTIONS SCORE
6.0/10
The LG QNED90 (LCD) is good for bright room, while the LG NANO90 (LCD) is only fair.
The LG QNED90 outperforms the LG NANO90 in a bright room due to its higher SDR and HDR brightness and better color volume, providing a clearer, more vibrant viewing experience. Additionally, while the LG NANO90 handles reflections very well, the QNED90's overall superior brightness helps to mitigate the impact of reflections more effectively, making it a better choice for bright environments.
Cost
$2,117
$2,650
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
$4,000
The LG NANO90 (LCD) has a price of $2,117 and the LG QNED90 (LCD) costs $2,650.
The LG NANO90 (LCD) and LG QNED90 (LCD) are both only fair for sports.
For watching sports, the LG NANO90 offers a good response time and handles reflections well, but its viewing angles and motion processing are only fair, making it less ideal for large groups or brightly lit rooms. The LG QNED90, on the other hand, offers slightly wider viewing angles and a higher reflections handling score, but shares the same level of motion processing and response time, presenting no significant advantage in fast-paced sports viewing conditions.
Gaming
8.0/10
8.1/10
7.6/10
RESPONSE TIME SCORE
7.6/10
8.7/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
8.0/10
7.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
7.5/10
50.0/100
GAMING LOCAL DIMMING
70.0/100
7.6/10
GAME HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.6/10
The LG QNED90 (LCD) and LG NANO90 (LCD) are both very good for gaming.
The LG NANO90 and LG QNED90 both display very good characteristics for gaming, with each having good response times and very good input lag performance. Additionally, the 120Hz refresh rate common to both models supports fluid motion, essential for a smooth gaming experience.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the LG NANO90 (LCD) and the LG QNED90 (LCD) compare to other TVs
"Here we have HDR pictures that look bright, but also manage to typically hit decently deep black levels.WebOS continues, though, to be one of the easiest to use. Connections are strong for a mid-range TV. Native 4K pictures look crisp and detailed."
"When it comes to HDR brightness it has very bright highlights and impressive HDR. In terms of design the QNED90 looks beautiful. The TV did great with fast response times, excellent reactions and instant rendering of all our commands. If you look for a good performing premium 4K TV the QNED90 ticks all the boxes."
Get a great deal on the LG NANO90 (LCD) or the LG QNED90 (LCD)
About LG
LG, a prominent TV brand from Korea, has played a significant role in popularizing OLED TVs. OLED technology is hailed as the future of TV technology. Their TVs employ WebOS, a proprietary smart TV software that not only offers seamless functionality but also includes gaming-specific features, earning praise from players worldwide. Often regarded as the gateway to unparalleled viewing experiences, LG's mid-range OLEDs come highly recommended, making them a worthwhile investment for those willing to stretch their budget for superior quality.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec TVs team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest TV information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
385
TVs evaluated
33,110
TVs stats compiled
21
Proprietary TVs ratings developed
99,030
Recommendations made
14,855
Consumer hours saved
About the TV team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and TVs Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Jaime Roldán
TVs Expert
Jaime is a Colombia-based TV expert. He is an electronics engineer with 8 years of experience in the telecom sector and has been making TV recommendations for 12 years.