If you're focused on saving money and can live with decent picture quality for everyday watching, the LG NANO75 could be a fine choice for your needs. However, if you're willing to invest more for higher picture quality, especially for watching movies and playing games, the LG NANO90 will deliver a better overall experience. The NANO90 offers advantages like improved contrast and brightness, which help in a bright room, and more advanced gaming features such as high refresh rates, which make a noticeable difference in action-packed scenes and gameplay. Keep in mind though that the improved performance of the NANO90 comes at a higher cost compared to the NANO75. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG NANO75 (LCD)
The LG NANO75 (LCD) has no clear advantages over the LG NANO90 (LCD).
Advantages of the LG NANO90 (LCD)
Very good for gaming
Good for use as monitor
Very good reflections
Key differences
Gaming
5.7/10
8.0/10
6.1/10
RESPONSE TIME SCORE
7.6/10
10.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
8.7/10
7.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
7.5/10
0.0/100
GAMING LOCAL DIMMING
50.0/100
5.7/10
GAME HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.6/10
The LG NANO90 (LCD) is very good for gaming, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The LG NANO90 has a higher refresh rate and significantly better input lag, which results in smoother gameplay and quicker response to input, key for competitive gaming. Conversely, the LG NANO75 has a lower refresh rate and worse input lag, resulting in less fluid motion and slower response times not ideal for fast-paced games.
Bright Room
5.8/10
6.9/10
6.8/10
VIEWING ANGLE
6.3/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.8/10
5.5/10
HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.2/10
7.8/10
REFLECTIONS SCORE
8.0/10
The LG NANO90 (LCD) is only fair for bright room, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The LG NANO75 struggles in bright rooms mainly due to its poor SDR and HDR brightness, making it difficult to overcome glare and maintain vivid picture quality, while its good reflection handling is not enough to counterbalance the brightness issue. Conversely, the LG NANO90 performs somewhat better in these environments thanks to its higher SDR and HDR brightness, coupled with very good reflection handling, which together mitigate the impact of ambient light on the viewing experience.
Cost
$1,883
$2,117
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
The LG NANO75 (LCD) has a price of $1,883 and the LG NANO90 (LCD) costs $2,117.
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers LG NANO90 (LCD) to have only fair picture quality, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) has poor picture quality.
Movies & TV
5.2/10
5.6/10
4.97/10
CONTRAST
5.28/10
5.0/10
BLACK UNIFORMITY
5.3/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
7.5/10
Yes
HDR10 SUPPORT
Yes
No
HDR10+ SUPPORT
No
No
DOLBY VISION SUPPORT
Yes
The LG NANO90 (LCD) and LG NANO75 (LCD) are both poor for movies & TV.
The LG NANO75 and LG NANO90 are both not ideal for watching movies and cinematic TV because they have limited contrast, poor black uniformity, and lack effective local dimming which are crucial for deep dark scenes and good picture quality in darker environments. Additionally, while the LG NANO90 has slightly better contrast than the LG NANO75, both TVs struggle with maintaining consistent color and brightness across different viewing angles, which affects the overall viewing experience.
Sports
6.7/10
6.8/10
7.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
7.5/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
120Hz
10.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
8.7/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
7.5/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.8/10
Yes
HLG SUPPORT
Yes
The LG NANO90 (LCD) and LG NANO75 (LCD) are both only fair for sports.
Both the LG NANO75 and LG NANO90 have fair motion processing capabilities, but the NANO90 outperforms the NANO75 in response time, which is very important for watching sports. The NANO90 has better handling of reflections, which is crucial in bright rooms, and both TVs offer comparable viewing angles and gray uniformity, making them similarly capable in a general viewing environment.
Cartoons & Animation
5.9/10
5.6/10
6.5/10
COLOR GAMUT SCORE
6.5/10
5.8/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
6.6/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.8/10
7.7/10
COLORS OUT OF THE BOX SCORE
4.3/10
6.0/10
GRAY UNIFORMITY
5.9/10
The LG NANO75 (LCD) and LG NANO90 (LCD) are both poor for cartoons & animation.
The LG NANO75 has better colors out of the box, which is important for watching cartoons and animation, but it has a poor color volume, which affects how rich and vivid the colors appear. On the other hand, the LG NANO90 is rated poorly for colors out of the box, meaning the initial color settings may not be ideal for cartoons and animation, and it also has a fair color volume, which is somewhat better than the NANO75 but still may not provide the most vibrant colors for animated content.
News, Talk, & Other TV
6.1/10
6.4/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.8/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
7.5/10
The LG NANO90 (LCD) and LG NANO75 (LCD) are both only fair for news, talk, & other TV.
The LG NANO75 might not be the best choice if you need a TV that brightens up well, despite good upscaling which ensures your standard content looks clear. Meanwhile, the LG NANO90 might offer a better experience with better brightness and contrast, but it may not display colors as vibrantly out of the box compared to some other TVs.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the LG NANO75 (LCD) and the LG NANO90 (LCD) compare to other TVs
"Here we have HDR pictures that look bright, but also manage to typically hit decently deep black levels.WebOS continues, though, to be one of the easiest to use. Connections are strong for a mid-range TV. Native 4K pictures look crisp and detailed."
Get a great deal on the LG NANO75 (LCD) or the LG NANO90 (LCD)
About LG
LG, a prominent TV brand from Korea, has played a significant role in popularizing OLED TVs. OLED technology is hailed as the future of TV technology. Their TVs employ WebOS, a proprietary smart TV software that not only offers seamless functionality but also includes gaming-specific features, earning praise from players worldwide. Often regarded as the gateway to unparalleled viewing experiences, LG's mid-range OLEDs come highly recommended, making them a worthwhile investment for those willing to stretch their budget for superior quality.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec TVs team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest TV information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
385
TVs evaluated
33,110
TVs stats compiled
21
Proprietary TVs ratings developed
131,730
Recommendations made
19,760
Consumer hours saved
About the TV team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and TVs Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Jaime Roldán
TVs Expert
Jaime is a Colombia-based TV expert. He is an electronics engineer with 8 years of experience in the telecom sector and has been making TV recommendations for 12 years.