The LG B3 OLED TV is generally better for watching movies in dark rooms because of its superior contrast and perfect blacks. However, OLED screens can have a risk of burn-in over time, especially if static content is displayed frequently. The LG QNED90, a higher-priced LCD option, is likely to offer a brighter display which could be better for viewing in well-lit rooms, and has no risk of burn-in. The QNED90 might also be more suitable if you want more vibrant colors and brighter highlights, which can enhance the viewing experience for sports and gaming. If you are on a budget and mostly watch TV in a darker environment, the LG B3 OLED could be the better choice. If you prefer a very bright display for a sunny room and are willing to invest more, the LG QNED90 might serve you better. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG QNED90 (LCD)
The LG QNED90 (LCD) has no clear advantages over the LG B3 (OLED).
Advantages of the LG B3 (OLED)
Excellent for dark room
Excellent for movies & TV
Very good for sports
Very good for cartoons & animation
Very good for use as monitor
Very good motion processing
Best in class viewing angle
Excellent reflections
Key differences
Picture Quality
7.3/10
8.8/10
5.60/10
CONTRAST
10/10
7.4/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
8.1/10
LED FALD
PANEL TYPE
WOLED
IPS
PANEL SUB-TYPE
WBC
The LG B3 (OLED) has very good picture quality, while the LG QNED90 (LCD) has good picture quality.
Movies & TV
6.8/10
9.2/10
5.60/10
CONTRAST
10/10
5.3/10
BLACK UNIFORMITY
10.0/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
7.0/10
Yes
HDR10 SUPPORT
Yes
No
HDR10+ SUPPORT
No
Yes
DOLBY VISION SUPPORT
Yes
The LG B3 (OLED) is excellent for movies & TV, while the LG QNED90 (LCD) is only fair.
The LG B3's OLED screen has perfect black uniformity and contrast, which are crucial for an excellent cinematic experience, while its viewing angles and color performance further strengthen its suitability for movies and TV. In comparison, the LG QNED90's LCD screen offers inferior black uniformity and lower contrast, which makes it less ideal for viewing content that benefits from deep blacks and high contrast, though it maintains decent color and viewing angle performance.
Sports
6.7/10
8.3/10
7.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
8.0/10
120Hz
REFRESH RATE
120Hz
8.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
10.0/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
7.0/10
8.7/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.1/10
Yes
HLG SUPPORT
Yes
The LG B3 (OLED) is very good for sports, while the LG QNED90 (LCD) is only fair.
The LG B3 (OLED) provides a better sports viewing experience because it has superior motion handling and response time, essential for fast-moving content, and better viewing angles for consistency from different seating positions. Meanwhile, the LG QNED90 (LCD) has fair performance in these areas but may show slower response times and less uniform colors at wide angles, affecting the overall sports viewing experience.
Gaming
8.1/10
8.9/10
7.6/10
RESPONSE TIME SCORE
9.4/10
8.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
10.0/10
7.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
8.0/10
70.0/100
GAMING LOCAL DIMMING
100.0/100
8.6/10
GAME HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.5/10
The LG B3 (OLED) and LG QNED90 (LCD) are both very good for gaming, though the LG B3 (OLED) is somewhat better.
The LG QNED90 offers very good gaming performance with its quick response time and very low input lag, providing a smooth gaming experience particularly suited for fast-paced action. On the other hand, the LG B3 steps up the gaming experience even further with an excellent response time and the best input lag performance, making it highly responsive for even the most demanding gamers.
Cartoons & Animation
7.6/10
8.7/10
7.8/10
COLOR GAMUT SCORE
8.3/10
7.4/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
8.1/10
8.7/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.1/10
7.6/10
COLORS OUT OF THE BOX SCORE
8.5/10
5.8/10
GRAY UNIFORMITY
9.5/10
The LG B3 (OLED) is very good for cartoons & animation, while the LG QNED90 (LCD) is good.
The LG B3 (OLED) delivers very good colors right out of the box and boasts a very good color gamut, which means more vibrant and diverse colors when watching cartoons and animation, whereas the LG QNED90 (LCD), while good in these aspects, doesn't quite reach the same level of color performance as the B3. Hence, if color accuracy and variety straight out of the box are a priority, the LG B3 is a more suitable choice, especially considering its superior color volume that contributes to richer and more nuanced visuals across different brightness levels.
Cost
$2,000
$998
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
The LG QNED90 (LCD) has a price of $2,000 and the LG B3 (OLED) costs $998.
The LG B3 (OLED) and LG QNED90 (LCD) are both very good for news, talk, & other TV.
The LG QNED90 (LCD) excels in upscaling lower resolution content and offers very good SDR brightness, which makes it well-suited for watching news and talk shows, especially in brighter rooms. The LG B3 (OLED), on the other hand, delivers excellent performance with deep blacks and a wide color gamut, providing a vibrant viewing experience for similar content but is better suited for rooms where light control is possible.
Bright Room
7.7/10
7.3/10
7.7/10
VIEWING ANGLE
9.5/10
8.7/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.1/10
8.3/10
HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.2/10
6.0/10
REFLECTIONS SCORE
9.2/10
The LG QNED90 (LCD) and LG B3 (OLED) are both good for bright room.
The LG QNED90 LCD TV displays brighter images in both standard and high dynamic range content, making it suitable for bright rooms, but its reflections handling is only fair, which might be problematic in very bright or sunlit rooms. The LG B3 OLED TV has excellent reflection handling improving visibility in bright conditions, but its overall brightness is less than the LG QNED90, which could make it slightly less ideal for the brightest settings. Both TVs have good contrast, color volume, and color gamut, which enhances the overall picture quality but is less critical than brightness and reflections in well-lit environments.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the LG QNED90 (LCD) and the LG B3 (OLED) compare to other TVs
"When it comes to HDR brightness it has very bright highlights and impressive HDR. In terms of design the QNED90 looks beautiful. The TV did great with fast response times, excellent reactions and instant rendering of all our commands. If you look for a good performing premium 4K TV the QNED90 ticks all the boxes."
Get a great deal on the LG QNED90 (LCD) or the LG B3 (OLED)
About LG
LG, a prominent TV brand from Korea, has played a significant role in popularizing OLED TVs. OLED technology is hailed as the future of TV technology. Their TVs employ WebOS, a proprietary smart TV software that not only offers seamless functionality but also includes gaming-specific features, earning praise from players worldwide. Often regarded as the gateway to unparalleled viewing experiences, LG's mid-range OLEDs come highly recommended, making them a worthwhile investment for those willing to stretch their budget for superior quality.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec TVs team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest TV information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
385
TVs evaluated
33,110
TVs stats compiled
21
Proprietary TVs ratings developed
122,430
Recommendations made
18,365
Consumer hours saved
About the TV team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and TVs Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Jaime Roldán
TVs Expert
Jaime is a Colombia-based TV expert. He is an electronics engineer with 8 years of experience in the telecom sector and has been making TV recommendations for 12 years.