A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Company ProductName Specs
Company ProductName Specs
What we think
The PerfectRec TV team Learn more
Updated January 10, 2024·
The LG NANO75 and the Samsung AU8000 are similarly priced LCD TVs. The LG NANO75 has stronger performance in gaming and wider viewing angles, making it more suitable for video games and group watching. The Samsung AU8000, on the other hand, offers better picture quality for movies and dark room performance, and features HLG support—a plus for HDR content. It also has a slightly better reflection handling that can be beneficial in bright rooms. Both TVs are good for sports content and have similar input capabilities. If you prioritize viewing angle and gaming, go for the LG NANO75. If movie watching and performance in darker settings are more important, the Samsung AU8000 would be the better choice. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG NANO75 (LCD)
- Good motion processing
Advantages of the Samsung AU8000 (LCD)
- The Samsung AU8000 (LCD) has no clear advantages over the LG NANO75 (LCD).
Key differences
Picture Quality
5.6
6.6
4.97/10
CONTRAST
6.71/10
5.8/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
6.3/10
LED
PANEL TYPE
LED
IPS
PANEL SUB-TYPE
VA
The Samsung AU8000 (LCD) has only fair picture quality, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) has poor picture quality.
Movies & TV
5.2
5.9
4.97/10
CONTRAST
6.71/10
5.0/10
BLACK UNIFORMITY
6.9/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
7.5/10
Yes
HDR10 SUPPORT
Yes
No
HDR10+ SUPPORT
Yes
No
DOLBY VISION SUPPORT
No
The Samsung AU8000 (LCD) and LG NANO75 (LCD) are both poor for movies & TV, though the Samsung AU8000 (LCD) is somewhat better.
The LG NANO75 and Samsung AU8000 both perform poorly for movies and cinematic TV because they lack effective local dimming and display weak black uniformity, making it difficult to achieve deep blacks essential for good contrast. Also, while both TVs offer decent color accuracy out of the box, they suffer from limited color volume and gray uniformity, which can result in colors that lack vibrancy and scenes with uneven shading.
Cartoons & Animation
5.9
6.9
6.5/10
COLOR GAMUT SCORE
6.1/10
5.8/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
6.3/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.1/10
7.7/10
COLORS OUT OF THE BOX SCORE
7.2/10
6.0/10
GRAY UNIFORMITY
6.8/10
The Samsung AU8000 (LCD) is only fair for cartoons & animation, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The LG NANO75 displays cartoons and animations poorly due to its subpar color volume and fair color accuracy out of the box, compromising the vividness and variety of shades required for animated content. Conversely, the Samsung AU8000 is considered fair because, despite also having fair color accuracy out of the box, it offers better contrast and gray uniformity, leading to a slightly better display of vibrant cartoon imagery.
News, Talk, & Other TV
6.1
6.7
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.1/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
7.5/10
The Samsung AU8000 (LCD) and LG NANO75 (LCD) are both only fair for news, talk, & other TV, though the Samsung AU8000 (LCD) is somewhat better.
The LG NANO75 has fair color accuracy out of the box and a decent color gamut, which are important for a natural and vibrant image, but its SDR brightness is only rated as poor, making it less suitable for very bright rooms. The Samsung AU8000 also has fair color accuracy and color gamut, with a better SDR brightness, making it a better option for well-lit environments, but its overall picture quality is compromised by lower contrast and absence of local dimming which affects the depth of images.
Bright Room
5.8
6.3
6.8/10
VIEWING ANGLE
5.5/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.1/10
5.5/10
HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
5.7/10
7.8/10
REFLECTIONS SCORE
7.8/10
The Samsung AU8000 (LCD) is only fair for bright room, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The LG NANO75 struggles in a bright room because it has a lower contrast and handles reflections only decently, with less than ideal SDR and HDR brightness. In contrast, the Samsung AU8000 performs better thanks to its higher contrast and better handling of SDR brightness, although it still faces challenges with reflections and HDR brightness.
Cost
$900
$648
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
The LG NANO75 (LCD) has a price of $900 and the Samsung AU8000 (LCD) costs $648.
Let Us Help Find Your Perfect TV
Find your new TV
Key similarities
Sports
6.7
6.5
7.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
6.0/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
10.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
10.0/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
7.5/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.1/10
Yes
HLG SUPPORT
Yes
The LG NANO75 (LCD) and Samsung AU8000 (LCD) are both only fair for sports.
The LG NANO75 and the Samsung AU8000 both offer fair performance for watching sports, but they have differences that might sway your decision. The LG NANO75's IPS screen provides better viewing angles, which is advantageous if you often watch games with a large group spread out across the room, but it has a lower contrast ratio which might make it less suitable for very dark rooms; the Samsung AU8000, on the other hand, has a VA panel which provides a higher contrast ratio for deeper blacks but poorer viewing angles that might limit viewing positions.
Gaming
5.7
5.8
6.1/10
RESPONSE TIME SCORE
5.9/10
10.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
10.0/10
7.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
6.0/10
0.0/100
GAMING LOCAL DIMMING
0.0/100
5.7/10
GAME HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
5.8/10
The Samsung AU8000 (LCD) and LG NANO75 (LCD) are both poor for gaming.
The LG NANO75 has a response time that is only fair, which might lead to motion blur during fast-paced gaming, although its input lag is rated the best, ensuring minimal delay between an input and the action on-screen. In contrast, the Samsung AU8000 also has the best input lag, but its response time is rated poor, which can result in even more noticeable blur during quick movements in games.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the LG NANO75 (LCD) and the Samsung AU8000 (LCD) compare to other TVs
Spec Comparison
 |  | |
| LG NANO75 (LCD) | Samsung AU8000 (LCD) |
GENERAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | |||
$900 | $648 | ||
Brand | |||
Brand | LG | Samsung | |
Release Date | |||
Release Date | March 4, 2022 | March 4, 2021 | |
Full name | |||
Full name | 65NANO75 | UN65AU8000 | |
Screen Size | |||
Screen Size | 65" | 65" | |
Screen Resolution | |||
Screen Resolution | 4K | 4K | |
TV FEATURES | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Operating System | |||
Operating System | webOS | Tizen | |
Sound Quality Score | |||
Sound Quality Score | 6.1/10 | 6/10 | |
NextGen Ready | |||
NextGen Ready | No | No | |
HDMI Ports | |||
HDMI Ports | 3 | 3 | |
Coax Ports | |||
Coax Ports | 1 | 1 | |
DISPLAY QUALITY SCORES | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Picture Quality Score | |||
Picture Quality Score | 5.7/10 | 6.6/10 | |
Bright Room Score | |||
Bright Room Score | 5.8/10 | 6.4/10 | |
Gaming Score | |||
Gaming Score | 5.7/10 | 5.8/10 | |
Movies & TV Score | |||
Movies & TV Score | 5.3/10 | 5.9/10 | |
Sports Score | |||
Sports Score | 6.7/10 | 6.5/10 | |
PHYSICAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Dimensions w/o Stand (H x W x D) | |||
Dimensions w/o Stand (H x W x D) | 33" x 57.2" x 2.3" | 32.7" x 57.1" x 1" | |
Dimensions with Stand (H x W) | |||
Dimensions with Stand (H x W) | 35.4" x 57.2" | 34.4" x 57.1" | |
Weight without Stand | |||
Weight without Stand | 49.8 lbs | 46.1 lbs | |
VESA Mount | |||
VESA Mount | 300 x 300 | 400 x 300 | |
DISPLAY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Color Depth | |||
Color Depth | 10 bit | 10 bit | |
Black Frame Insertion | |||
Black Frame Insertion | No | Yes | |
Auto Low Latency Mode | |||
Auto Low Latency Mode | Yes | Yes | |
Contrast | |||
Contrast | 5/10 | 6.7/10 | |
Local Dimming | |||
Local Dimming | 2.5/10 | 2.5/10 | |
SOUND | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Speaker Setup | |||
Speaker Setup | 2.0 | 2.0 | |
Speaker Power | |||
Speaker Power | 20 W | 20 W | |
Dolby Atmos | |||
Dolby Atmos | Yes | Bypass only | |
DTS:X | |||
DTS:X | No | No | |
Shopping
Samsung AU8000 (LCD)
See more
Dig into reviews and images
USA Today
Michael Desjardin | April 2023
"To put it directly: you’d never see a mid-range 4K TV hitting this black levels half a decade ago. AU8000 plays the part of a higher-end TV thanks to its sleek design. If you’re upgrading to a smart TV for the first time, the software is a great way to dip your toes in the streaming water."
Get a great deal on the LG NANO75 (LCD) or the Samsung AU8000 (LCD)
About LG
LG, a prominent TV brand from Korea, has played a significant role in popularizing OLED TVs. OLED technology is hailed as the future of TV technology. Their TVs employ WebOS, a proprietary smart TV software that not only offers seamless functionality but also includes gaming-specific features, earning praise from players worldwide. Often regarded as the gateway to unparalleled viewing experiences, LG's mid-range OLEDs come highly recommended, making them a worthwhile investment for those willing to stretch their budget for superior quality.
About Samsung
Samsung, a South Korean electronics manufacturer, holds the title of being the largest global TV vendor in terms of units sold. They offer a diverse lineup of TV products that cater to various budget ranges. A notable achievement in recent years is the development of Quantum Dots, a technology that enhances color reproduction, resulting in richer and more vibrant hues. Samsung TVs are well-regarded for their high manufacturing quality and user-friendly software, making them an excellent choice for consumers seeking an intuitive viewing experience.
Give feedback
We're constantly perfecting our model
TV guides you might be interested in
More comparisons for you
Compare LG NANO75 (LCD) vs. Hisense U8K (LCD)
VS
Compare LG NANO75 (LCD) vs. Samsung Q70A (LCD)
VS
Compare LG NANO75 (LCD) vs. Samsung Q60B (LCD)
VS
Compare Samsung AU8000 (LCD) vs. Samsung CU8000 (LCD)
VS
Compare Samsung AU8000 (LCD) vs. Hisense A6H (LCD)
VS
Compare Samsung AU8000 (LCD) vs. LG UP7000 (LCD)
VS
FAQs
FAQs about TVs
Why trust us
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec TVs team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest TV information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
385
TVs evaluated
33,110
TVs stats compiled
21
Proprietary TVs ratings developed
119,430
Recommendations made
17,915
Consumer hours saved
About the TV team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and TVs Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Jaime Roldán
TVs Expert
Jaime is a Colombia-based TV expert. He is an electronics engineer with 8 years of experience in the telecom sector and has been making TV recommendations for 12 years.
Featured in
