The Amazon Omni QLED offers better overall picture quality and superior performance for movies and series than the LG NANO75. It also has better sound quality and supports more HDR formats including HDR10+ and Dolby Vision, which can enhance your viewing experience for compatible content. However, it might not be as good as the LG in bright rooms and for sports content.
The LG NANO75, while generally less expensive, excels in bright room situations and has a slightly better performance when watching sports. It has a wider viewing angle, which makes it better for large gatherings. It may not offer the same picture quality for movies, and it lacks support for advanced HDR formats like HDR10+ and Dolby Vision. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Amazon Omni QLED (LCD)
Good for dark room
Good for movies & TV
Good for news, talk, & other TV
Very good for cartoons & animation
Advantages of the LG NANO75 (LCD)
Good for upscaling
Good motion processing
Good reflections
Key differences
Picture Quality
7.7/10
5.6/10
9.07/10
CONTRAST
4.97/10
8.2/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
5.8/10
LED FALD
PANEL TYPE
LED
VA
PANEL SUB-TYPE
IPS
The Amazon Omni QLED (LCD) has good picture quality, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) has poor picture quality.
Movies & TV
7.8/10
5.2/10
9.07/10
CONTRAST
4.97/10
6.5/10
BLACK UNIFORMITY
5.0/10
6.6/10
UPSCALING
7.5/10
Yes
HDR10 SUPPORT
Yes
Yes
HDR10+ SUPPORT
No
Yes
DOLBY VISION SUPPORT
No
The Amazon Omni QLED (LCD) is good for movies & TV, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The Amazon Omni QLED provides better contrast and efficient local dimming which results in deeper blacks, making it suitable for movies with darker scenes, whereas the LG NANO75 has lower contrast and lacks local dimming, leading to grayer blacks that can detract from cinematic experiences.
Sports
6.0/10
6.7/10
3.2/10
MOTION PROCESSING
7.5/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
8.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
10.0/10
6.6/10
UPSCALING
7.5/10
7.6/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
5.8/10
Yes
HLG SUPPORT
Yes
The LG NANO75 (LCD) and Amazon Omni QLED (LCD) are both only fair for sports, though the LG NANO75 (LCD) is somewhat better.
The Amazon Omni QLED has decent motion processing and response time but may struggle with wider viewing angles and reflection handling, making it less ideal for sports in bright rooms or wide seating arrangements. On the other hand, the LG NANO75 offers better viewing angles and reflection handling but falls short in motion processing and response time, which could result in blurrier action during fast-paced sports.
Gaming
6.4/10
5.7/10
6.1/10
RESPONSE TIME SCORE
6.1/10
8.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
10.0/10
3.2/10
MOTION PROCESSING
7.5/10
75.0/100
GAMING LOCAL DIMMING
0.0/100
6.5/10
GAME HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
5.7/10
The Amazon Omni QLED (LCD) is only fair for gaming, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The Amazon Omni QLED has a fair response time and very good input lag, making it suitable for casual gaming, whereas the LG NANO75, despite also having fair response time, has the best input lag, which renders it better for competitive gaming where every millisecond counts; however, since both have the same refresh rate, they'd perform similarly in terms of smoothness in high-speed gaming scenarios.
Cartoons & Animation
8.3/10
5.9/10
8.0/10
COLOR GAMUT SCORE
6.5/10
8.2/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
5.8/10
7.6/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
5.8/10
7.6/10
COLORS OUT OF THE BOX SCORE
7.7/10
7.0/10
GRAY UNIFORMITY
6.0/10
The Amazon Omni QLED (LCD) is very good for cartoons & animation, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The Amazon Omni QLED displays colors out of the box very well and has a superior color volume, which ensures vibrant and full colors for animations, whereas the LG NANO75, despite also having good colors out of the box, falls behind in color volume rendering it less ideal for the rich and varied colors typically found in cartoons and animation.
News, Talk, & Other TV
7.7/10
6.1/10
7.6/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
5.8/10
6.6/10
UPSCALING
7.5/10
The Amazon Omni QLED (LCD) is good for news, talk, & other TV, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is only fair.
The Amazon Omni QLED offers better SDR brightness, which makes it more suitable for viewing in well-lit environments and is therefore good for watching news and talk shows; it also has good upscaling to handle lower-resolution content often seen in TV programming. Conversely, the LG NANO75 has poorer SDR brightness, making it less ideal for bright rooms, and although it offers good upscaling, its overall performance for TV programs does not match that of the Amazon Omni QLED.
Bright Room
6.9/10
5.8/10
5.3/10
VIEWING ANGLE
6.8/10
7.6/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
5.8/10
6.3/10
HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
5.5/10
6.0/10
REFLECTIONS SCORE
7.8/10
The Amazon Omni QLED (LCD) is only fair for bright room, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The Amazon Omni QLED outperforms the LG NANO75 in a bright room due to its superior SDR and HDR brightness; it's fair in handling reflections, which aids its performance when there's ambient light. Conversely, the LG NANO75 falls short in the same conditions because of its poor SDR and HDR brightness and, despite having good reflections handling, it struggles with a lower contrast and color volume that impact its viewing quality in bright environments.
Cost
$600
$900
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
The Amazon Omni QLED (LCD) has a price of $600 and the LG NANO75 (LCD) costs $900.
"This really is a TV designed for the streaming generation ... And it’s good to see support for both HDR10+ and Dolby Vision because it means more of the content you stream will be available in HDR. Overall, the Omni QLED is an impressive TV. It’s pretty bright, has good contrast and – thanks to those quantum dots – vibrant colours."
Get a great deal on the Amazon Omni QLED (LCD) or the LG NANO75 (LCD)
About Amazon
Amazon, the largest online retailer in North America, has forged partnerships with TCL and Hisense to produce white-label TVs incorporating their Fire OS software. These Amazon-branded TVs typically compete in the low-end and mid-range segments, offering compelling price points. Leveraging their strong reputation, Amazon has swiftly built brand trust in the TV market despite being relatively new to it. To enhance their popularity, these TVs integrate features from the Amazon ecosystem, including Alexa, providing users with a seamless and interconnected TV experience.
About LG
LG, a prominent TV brand from Korea, has played a significant role in popularizing OLED TVs. OLED technology is hailed as the future of TV technology. Their TVs employ WebOS, a proprietary smart TV software that not only offers seamless functionality but also includes gaming-specific features, earning praise from players worldwide. Often regarded as the gateway to unparalleled viewing experiences, LG's mid-range OLEDs come highly recommended, making them a worthwhile investment for those willing to stretch their budget for superior quality.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec TVs team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest TV information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
385
TVs evaluated
33,110
TVs stats compiled
21
Proprietary TVs ratings developed
120,330
Recommendations made
18,050
Consumer hours saved
About the TV team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and TVs Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Jaime Roldán
TVs Expert
Jaime is a Colombia-based TV expert. He is an electronics engineer with 8 years of experience in the telecom sector and has been making TV recommendations for 12 years.