If you prefer superior picture quality and excellent performance for watching movies and gaming, and are willing to pay more, the LG C3 OLED is the better choice. Its OLED technology offers better contrast, black levels, and viewing angles than the LG NANO75 LCD. This makes the C3 especially good in dark rooms.
On the other hand, if you're on a tighter budget and want a TV that's still good for sports and regular TV viewing, the LG NANO75 is the more affordable option. However, it won't match the OLED's performance in dark environments or its overall picture quality. The NANO75 also has lower picture quality in bright rooms compared to the C3.
Keep in mind that OLED TVs like the C3 can have a risk of burn-in with constant static elements on the screen, whereas the NANO75 LCD is immune to burn-in. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG NANO75 (LCD)
The LG NANO75 (LCD) has no clear advantages over the LG C3 (OLED).
Advantages of the LG C3 (OLED)
Very good for bright room
Excellent for dark room
Excellent for gaming
Excellent for movies & TV
Very good for sports
Excellent for news, talk, & other TV
Very good for cartoons & animation
Excellent for use as monitor
Very good for upscaling
Very good motion processing
Best in class viewing angle
Best in class reflections
Key differences
Picture Quality
5.6/10
9.0/10
4.97/10
CONTRAST
10.00/10
5.8/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
8.1/10
LED
PANEL TYPE
WOLED
IPS
PANEL SUB-TYPE
WBE
The LG C3 (OLED) has excellent picture quality, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) has poor picture quality.
Movies & TV
5.2/10
9.2/10
4.97/10
CONTRAST
10.00/10
5.0/10
BLACK UNIFORMITY
10.0/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
8.0/10
Yes
HDR10 SUPPORT
Yes
No
HDR10+ SUPPORT
No
No
DOLBY VISION SUPPORT
Yes
The LG C3 (OLED) is excellent for movies & TV, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The LG NANO75 (LCD) has poor contrast, no local dimming, and weak black uniformity which leads to less impressive movie and cinematic TV scenes, especially in dark environments. In contrast, the LG C3 (OLED) boasts excellent contrast, effective local dimming, and superior black uniformity, creating more vivid and immersive visuals suitable for high-quality movie viewing.
Sports
6.7/10
8.5/10
7.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
8.0/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
120Hz
10.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
10.0/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
8.0/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.0/10
Yes
HLG SUPPORT
Yes
The LG C3 (OLED) is very good for sports, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is only fair.
The LG C3 (OLED) excels in sports viewing due to its superior motion processing, quicker response time, and better handling of reflections, which are critical for fast-paced action and varied lighting conditions. In contrast, the LG NANO75 (LCD) has more limited motion handling and response time, making fast-moving objects less clear, and its weaker reflections handling can detract from the viewing experience in bright rooms.
Gaming
5.7/10
9.0/10
6.1/10
RESPONSE TIME SCORE
10.0/10
10.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
10.0/10
7.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
8.0/10
0.0/100
GAMING LOCAL DIMMING
100.0/100
5.7/10
GAME HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.0/10
The LG C3 (OLED) is excellent for gaming, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The LG NANO75's fair response time and best input lag alongside a 60Hz refresh rate means it handles gaming decently but may show some blurring during fast-paced scenes, which is less optimal for serious gaming. In contrast, the LG C3's best scores in both response time and input lag, combined with a 120Hz refresh rate, provide a smoother and more responsive gaming experience.
Cartoons & Animation
5.9/10
8.8/10
6.5/10
COLOR GAMUT SCORE
8.3/10
5.8/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
8.1/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.0/10
7.7/10
COLORS OUT OF THE BOX SCORE
7.9/10
6.0/10
GRAY UNIFORMITY
10.0/10
The LG C3 (OLED) is very good for cartoons & animation, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The LG NANO75 (LCD) has colors out of the box and a color gamut that are considered just good and fair, respectively, which may result in less vibrant and accurate colors when watching cartoons & animation compared to the LG C3 (OLED) whose colors out of the box and color gamut are rated as good and very good, offering a much richer and more precise color experience for animated content.
News, Talk, & Other TV
6.1/10
9.0/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.0/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
8.0/10
The LG C3 (OLED) is excellent for news, talk, & other TV, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is only fair.
The LG C3 (OLED) excels in displaying news and TV programs due to its superior upscaling abilities and SDR brightness, making it excel in clarity and visibility even in non-HDR content. In contrast, the LG NANO75 (LCD) has lower performance in these areas, leading to less impressive picture quality for standard broadcasts and upscaling of lower-resolution content.
Bright Room
5.8/10
8.3/10
6.8/10
VIEWING ANGLE
9.5/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.0/10
5.5/10
HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.0/10
7.8/10
REFLECTIONS SCORE
10.0/10
The LG C3 (OLED) is very good for bright room, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The LG NANO75 struggles in bright rooms due to poor SDR and HDR brightness, along with only a good performance in handling reflections, meaning it's not as well-suited to environments with lots of natural or ambient light. In contrast, the LG C3 excels in bright room viewing as it has very good SDR and HDR brightness and the best reflection handling, resulting in clear and vibrant images even in well-lit spaces.
Cost
$900
$2,000
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
The LG NANO75 (LCD) has a price of $900 and the LG C3 (OLED) costs $2,000.
How the LG NANO75 (LCD) and the LG C3 (OLED) compare to other TVs
Spec Comparison
LG NANO75 (LCD)
LG C3 (OLED)
GENERAL
Price
Price
$900
$2,000
Brand
Brand
LG
LG
Release Date
Release Date
March 4, 2022
April 3, 2023
Full name
Full name
65NANO75
OLED65C3
Screen Size
Screen Size
65"
65"
Screen Resolution
Screen Resolution
4K
4K
Screen Type
Screen Type
LCD
OLED
Screen Sub-type
Screen Sub-type
LED IPS
WOLED WBE
Smart TV
Smart TV
Yes
Yes
TV FEATURES
Operating System
Operating System
webOS
webOS
Sound Quality Score
Sound Quality Score
6.1/10
8/10
NextGen Ready
NextGen Ready
No
No
HDMI Ports
HDMI Ports
3
4
Coax Ports
Coax Ports
1
1
Refresh Rate
Refresh Rate
60Hz
120Hz
Variable Refresh Rate
Variable Refresh Rate
No
Yes
HDR Supported formats
HDR Supported formats
HDR10, HLG
HDR10, Dolby Vision, HLG
Accessibility
Accessibility
None
Voice Commands
DISPLAY QUALITY SCORES
Picture Quality Score
Picture Quality Score
5.7/10
9/10
Bright Room Score
Bright Room Score
5.8/10
8.3/10
Gaming Score
Gaming Score
5.7/10
9/10
Movies & TV Score
Movies & TV Score
5.3/10
9.2/10
Sports Score
Sports Score
6.7/10
8.5/10
News, Talk, & Other TV Score
News, Talk, & Other TV Score
6.2/10
9.1/10
Cartoons & Animation Score
Cartoons & Animation Score
6/10
8.9/10
Use as Monitor Score
Use as Monitor Score
6.6/10
9.1/10
PHYSICAL
Dimensions w/o Stand (H x W x D)
Dimensions w/o Stand (H x W x D)
33" x 57.2" x 2.3"
32.5" x 56.7" x 1.8"
Dimensions with Stand (H x W)
Dimensions with Stand (H x W)
35.4" x 57.2"
34.6" x 56.7"
Weight without Stand
Weight without Stand
49.8 lbs
36.6 lbs
VESA Mount
VESA Mount
300 x 300
300 x 200
DISPLAY
Color Depth
Color Depth
10 bit
10 bit
Black Frame Insertion
Black Frame Insertion
No
Yes
Auto Low Latency Mode
Auto Low Latency Mode
Yes
Yes
Contrast
Contrast
5/10
10/10
Local Dimming
Local Dimming
2.5/10
10/10
Gaming Local Dimming
Gaming Local Dimming
0/100
10/100
Game HDR Brightness Score
Game HDR Brightness Score
5.8/10
8.1/10
SDR Brightness Score
SDR Brightness Score
5.8/10
8/10
HDR Brightness Score
HDR Brightness Score
5.6/10
8/10
Gray Uniformity
Gray Uniformity
6/10
10/10
Black Uniformity
Black Uniformity
5.1/10
10/10
Viewing Angle
Viewing Angle
6.8/10
9.6/10
Reflections Score
Reflections Score
7.9/10
10/10
Upscaling
Upscaling
7.5/10
8/10
Motion Processing
Motion Processing
7.5/10
8/10
Color Gamut Score
Color Gamut Score
6.6/10
8.3/10
Color Volume Score
Color Volume Score
5.9/10
8.1/10
Response Time Score
Response Time Score
6.1/10
10/10
Input Lag Score
Input Lag Score
10/10
10/10
Colors Out of the Box Score
Colors Out of the Box Score
7.7/10
7.9/10
Quality Control
Quality Control
7/10
8.8/10
Chroma Subsampling Score
Chroma Subsampling Score
7/10
8/10
SOUND
Speaker Setup
Speaker Setup
2.0
2.2
Speaker Power
Speaker Power
20 W
Unknown
Dolby Atmos
Dolby Atmos
Yes
Yes
DTS:X
DTS:X
No
No
Get a great deal on the LG NANO75 (LCD) or the LG C3 (OLED)
About LG
LG, a prominent TV brand from Korea, has played a significant role in popularizing OLED TVs. OLED technology is hailed as the future of TV technology. Their TVs employ WebOS, a proprietary smart TV software that not only offers seamless functionality but also includes gaming-specific features, earning praise from players worldwide. Often regarded as the gateway to unparalleled viewing experiences, LG's mid-range OLEDs come highly recommended, making them a worthwhile investment for those willing to stretch their budget for superior quality.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec TVs team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest TV information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
385
TVs evaluated
33,110
TVs stats compiled
21
Proprietary TVs ratings developed
122,430
Recommendations made
18,365
Consumer hours saved
About the TV team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and TVs Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Jaime Roldán
TVs Expert
Jaime is a Colombia-based TV expert. He is an electronics engineer with 8 years of experience in the telecom sector and has been making TV recommendations for 12 years.