A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Company ProductName Specs
Company ProductName Specs
What we think
The PerfectRec TV team Learn more
Updated January 10, 2024·
The LG NANO75 is typically much less expensive and might be a good choice if you're looking for a more budget-friendly option. It performs reasonably well for sports content and has a decent overall picture quality. However, it's not the best choice for dark room viewing due to its lower dark room performance. On the other hand, the LG QNED90 offers significantly better dark room performance and overall picture quality, making it a better choice for cinematic experiences and HDR content. It also has a better gaming experience and is suited for bright rooms. This TV is more expensive, though, so this choice may hinge on whether the enhanced quality is worth the additional cost for you. Both TVs have limitations with reflections and might not be ideal for very bright environments. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG NANO75 (LCD)
- Good reflections
Advantages of the LG QNED90 (LCD)
- Good for bright room
- Good for dark room
- Very good for gaming
- Very good for news, talk, & other TV
- Good for cartoons & animation
- Good for use as monitor
- Good viewing angle
Key differences
Picture Quality
5.6
7.3
4.97/10
CONTRAST
5.60/10
5.8/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
7.4/10
LED
PANEL TYPE
LED FALD
IPS
PANEL SUB-TYPE
IPS
The LG QNED90 (LCD) has good picture quality, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) has poor picture quality.
Movies & TV
5.2
6.8
4.97/10
CONTRAST
5.60/10
5.0/10
BLACK UNIFORMITY
5.3/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
7.5/10
Yes
HDR10 SUPPORT
Yes
No
HDR10+ SUPPORT
No
No
DOLBY VISION SUPPORT
Yes
The LG QNED90 (LCD) is only fair for movies & TV, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The LG NANO75 struggles with movies and cinematic TV primarily due to its poor contrast, lack of local dimming, and inferior black uniformity; these factors are key for producing deep blacks and a rich picture, especially in darker scenes. The LG QNED90 offers a better experience, offering fair performances in movies and cinematic TV by providing better contrast, local dimming support, and improved black uniformity, which contribute to a more compelling viewing experience in various lighting conditions and content types.
Gaming
5.7
8.1
6.1/10
RESPONSE TIME SCORE
7.6/10
10.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
8.0/10
7.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
7.5/10
0.0/100
GAMING LOCAL DIMMING
70.0/100
5.7/10
GAME HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.6/10
The LG QNED90 (LCD) is very good for gaming, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The LG NANO75 has a fair response time and the best input lag which may suit casual gamers, but the LG QNED90 offers both very good response time and input lag, along with a higher refresh rate, making it a preferred option for a more responsive and smooth gaming experience.
Cartoons & Animation
5.9
7.6
6.5/10
COLOR GAMUT SCORE
7.8/10
5.8/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
7.4/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.7/10
7.7/10
COLORS OUT OF THE BOX SCORE
7.6/10
6.0/10
GRAY UNIFORMITY
5.8/10
The LG QNED90 (LCD) is good for cartoons & animation, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The LG NANO75 is considered poor for watching cartoons and animation because it has fair colors out of the box and a poor color gamut, limiting its ability to display vibrant and varied colors. In contrast, the LG QNED90 is considered good due to better performance in colors out of the box and a good color gamut, allowing for more accurate and wider color representation, which enhances animated content.
News, Talk, & Other TV
6.1
8.0
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.7/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
7.5/10
The LG QNED90 (LCD) is very good for news, talk, & other TV, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is only fair.
The LG QNED90 boasts stronger contrast, more effective local dimming, and higher SDR brightness, making it superior for news and talk shows compared to the LG NANO75, which has poorer contrast, no local dimming, and lower SDR brightness. Additionally, the QNED90 displays colors more accurately straight out of the box, has a wider color gamut, and thus will offer a more vibrant and detailed picture when watching standard programs.
Bright Room
5.8
7.7
6.8/10
VIEWING ANGLE
7.7/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.7/10
5.5/10
HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.3/10
7.8/10
REFLECTIONS SCORE
6.0/10
The LG QNED90 (LCD) is good for bright room, while the LG NANO75 (LCD) is poor.
The LG NANO75 has poor SDR and HDR brightness, making it less suitable for bright rooms, and while it handles reflections well, it can't overcome its dimmer screen. In contrast, the LG QNED90 offers very good brightness for both SDR and HDR content, along with fair reflection handling, which combined, provide a better viewing experience in well-lit environments.
Cost
$900
$2,000
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
The LG NANO75 (LCD) has a price of $900 and the LG QNED90 (LCD) costs $2,000.
Let Us Help Find Your Perfect TV
Find your new TV
Key similarities
Sports
6.7
6.7
7.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
7.5/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
120Hz
10.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
8.0/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
7.5/10
5.8/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.7/10
Yes
HLG SUPPORT
Yes
The LG QNED90 (LCD) and LG NANO75 (LCD) are both only fair for sports.
The LG NANO75 and LG QNED90 both have good response times and motion processing, which are critical for sports viewing, but the QNED90 is a step ahead with better viewing angles and less reflective screens, enhancing group viewing and sunny room usage. However, the good gray uniformity of the NANO75 is important in maintaining consistent colors across the screen, a key aspect for an immersive sports watching experience.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the LG NANO75 (LCD) and the LG QNED90 (LCD) compare to other TVs
Spec Comparison
 |  | |
| LG NANO75 (LCD) | LG QNED90 (LCD) |
GENERAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | |||
$900 | $2,000 | ||
Brand | |||
Brand | LG | LG | |
Release Date | |||
Release Date | March 4, 2022 | April 1, 2021 | |
Full name | |||
Full name | 65NANO75 | 65QNED90 | |
Screen Size | |||
Screen Size | 65" | 65" | |
Screen Resolution | |||
Screen Resolution | 4K | 4K | |
TV FEATURES | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Operating System | |||
Operating System | webOS | webOS | |
Sound Quality Score | |||
Sound Quality Score | 6.1/10 | 7/10 | |
NextGen Ready | |||
NextGen Ready | No | No | |
HDMI Ports | |||
HDMI Ports | 3 | 4 | |
Coax Ports | |||
Coax Ports | 1 | 1 | |
DISPLAY QUALITY SCORES | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Picture Quality Score | |||
Picture Quality Score | 5.7/10 | 7.4/10 | |
Bright Room Score | |||
Bright Room Score | 5.8/10 | 7.8/10 | |
Gaming Score | |||
Gaming Score | 5.7/10 | 8.1/10 | |
Movies & TV Score | |||
Movies & TV Score | 5.3/10 | 6.8/10 | |
Sports Score | |||
Sports Score | 6.7/10 | 6.8/10 | |
PHYSICAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Dimensions w/o Stand (H x W x D) | |||
Dimensions w/o Stand (H x W x D) | 33" x 57.2" x 2.3" | 32.6" x 56.9" x 1.1" | |
Dimensions with Stand (H x W) | |||
Dimensions with Stand (H x W) | 35.4" x 57.2" | 35.4" x 56.9" | |
Weight without Stand | |||
Weight without Stand | 49.8 lbs | 57.8 lbs | |
VESA Mount | |||
VESA Mount | 300 x 300 | 400 X 400 | |
DISPLAY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Color Depth | |||
Color Depth | 10 bit | 10 bit | |
Black Frame Insertion | |||
Black Frame Insertion | No | Yes | |
Auto Low Latency Mode | |||
Auto Low Latency Mode | Yes | Yes | |
Contrast | |||
Contrast | 5/10 | 5.6/10 | |
Local Dimming | |||
Local Dimming | 2.5/10 | 6.5/10 | |
SOUND | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Speaker Setup | |||
Speaker Setup | 2.0 | 2.2 | |
Speaker Power | |||
Speaker Power | 20 W | 40 W | |
Dolby Atmos | |||
Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes | |
DTS:X | |||
DTS:X | No | No | |
Shopping
LG QNED90 (LCD)
See more
Dig into reviews and images
Home Media Entertainment
Stratos Kampourogiannis | September 2021
"When it comes to HDR brightness it has very bright highlights and impressive HDR. In terms of design the QNED90 looks beautiful. The TV did great with fast response times, excellent reactions and instant rendering of all our commands. If you look for a good performing premium 4K TV the QNED90 ticks all the boxes."
Get a great deal on the LG NANO75 (LCD) or the LG QNED90 (LCD)
About LG
LG, a prominent TV brand from Korea, has played a significant role in popularizing OLED TVs. OLED technology is hailed as the future of TV technology. Their TVs employ WebOS, a proprietary smart TV software that not only offers seamless functionality but also includes gaming-specific features, earning praise from players worldwide. Often regarded as the gateway to unparalleled viewing experiences, LG's mid-range OLEDs come highly recommended, making them a worthwhile investment for those willing to stretch their budget for superior quality.
Give feedback
We're constantly perfecting our model
TV guides you might be interested in
More comparisons for you
FAQs
FAQs about TVs
Why trust us
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec TVs team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest TV information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
385
TVs evaluated
33,110
TVs stats compiled
21
Proprietary TVs ratings developed
132,030
Recommendations made
19,805
Consumer hours saved
About the TV team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and TVs Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Jaime Roldán
TVs Expert
Jaime is a Colombia-based TV expert. He is an electronics engineer with 8 years of experience in the telecom sector and has been making TV recommendations for 12 years.
Featured in
