Choose the Hisense UX if you prioritize superior picture quality, especially in bright rooms, and plan to use the TV for gaming, sports, and movies, thanks to its excellent color accuracy, brightness, and contrast. It's also ideal for well-lit spaces with its Best in Class bright room performance. However, it comes at a high-end price point.
Opt for the Samsung CU8000 if budget is a concern and you're looking for a decent all-around TV with fair performance across various content types. It's a cost-effective choice that still offers good color and motion processing. Just be aware that it may not impress in dark rooms and has limited HDR capabilities. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Hisense UX (LCD)
Best in class for bright room
Very good for dark room
Very good for gaming
Very good for movies & TV
Very good for news, talk, & other TV
Excellent for cartoons & animation
Very good for use as monitor
Good for upscaling
Good viewing angle
Very good reflections
Advantages of the Samsung CU8000 (LCD)
Very good motion processing
Key differences
Picture Quality
8.8/10
5.8/10
8.00/10
CONTRAST
4.92/10
10.0/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
6.9/10
miniLED FALD
PANEL TYPE
LED
VA
PANEL SUB-TYPE
VA
The Hisense UX (LCD) has very good picture quality, while the Samsung CU8000 (LCD) has poor picture quality.
Movies & TV
8.5/10
5.3/10
8.00/10
CONTRAST
4.92/10
10.0/10
BLACK UNIFORMITY
6.1/10
7.0/10
UPSCALING
6.0/10
Yes
HDR10 SUPPORT
Yes
Yes
HDR10+ SUPPORT
Yes
Yes
DOLBY VISION SUPPORT
No
The Hisense UX (LCD) is very good for movies & TV, while the Samsung CU8000 (LCD) is poor.
The Hisense UX delivers a superior cinematic experience with its excellent contrast, effective local dimming, and best-in-class black uniformity, which are crucial for deep blacks and fine shadow details in dark scenes. In contrast, the Samsung CU8000 falls short, owing to poor contrast, the absence of local dimming, and weaker black uniformity, diminishing its ability to produce the deep blacks and rich details typically desired for watching movies and cinematic TV.
Gaming
8.4/10
5.5/10
8.4/10
RESPONSE TIME SCORE
4.9/10
7.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
8.7/10
4.2/10
MOTION PROCESSING
8.2/10
90.0/100
GAMING LOCAL DIMMING
0.0/100
10.0/10
GAME HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
5.8/10
The Hisense UX (LCD) is very good for gaming, while the Samsung CU8000 (LCD) is poor.
The Hisense UX excels in gaming because it has very good response time and good input lag, which are crucial for a smooth and responsive gaming experience. In contrast, while the Samsung CU8000 has very good input lag, its poor response time can lead to motion blur and a less enjoyable gaming experience.
Cartoons & Animation
9.0/10
5.9/10
8.6/10
COLOR GAMUT SCORE
7.3/10
10.0/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
6.9/10
10.0/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
6.7/10
7.7/10
COLORS OUT OF THE BOX SCORE
6.2/10
6.8/10
GRAY UNIFORMITY
6.6/10
The Hisense UX (LCD) is excellent for cartoons & animation, while the Samsung CU8000 (LCD) is poor.
The Hisense UX displays cartoons and animation excellently, in part due to its good color accuracy out of the box and very good color gamut, meaning it can produce a wide range of vivid and true-to-life colors. Conversely, the Samsung CU8000 is considered poor for the same content as it has only fair color accuracy out of the box and a good color gamut, which is less capable of reproducing the rich, diverse colors typically found in animated content.
News, Talk, & Other TV
8.6/10
5.7/10
10.0/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
6.7/10
7.0/10
UPSCALING
6.0/10
The Hisense UX (LCD) is very good for news, talk, & other TV, while the Samsung CU8000 (LCD) is poor.
The Hisense UX is better for watching news and TV programs due to its superior upscaling of lower-resolution content and much higher SDR brightness, which enhances visibility in various lighting conditions, whereas the Samsung CU8000's performance in these key areas is less adept, making it less suitable for such content. Colors out of the box are also better on the Hisense UX, providing a more vibrant picture without the need for calibration, compared to the Samsung CU8000 that may appear less accurate and require adjustment.
Bright Room
10.0/10
5.9/10
7.0/10
VIEWING ANGLE
5.2/10
10.0/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
6.7/10
10.0/10
HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
5.5/10
8.9/10
REFLECTIONS SCORE
5.9/10
The Hisense UX (LCD) is best in class for bright room, while the Samsung CU8000 (LCD) is poor.
The Hisense UX outperforms the Samsung CU8000 in bright rooms due to its superior SDR and HDR brightness and very good reflection handling, making it suitable for well-lit environments. In contrast, the Samsung CU8000 has poorer reflection handling and lower brightness in both SDR and HDR, which makes it less ideal for viewing in bright rooms.
Cost
$2,498
$648
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
The Hisense UX (LCD) has a price of $2,498 and the Samsung CU8000 (LCD) costs $648.
The Hisense UX (LCD) and Samsung CU8000 (LCD) are both only fair for sports.
The Hisense UX's strengths in sports watching include its high response time and motion processing capabilities, vital for fast-paced action, but it is let down by a fair reflections handling which can be problematic in bright rooms. On the other hand, the Samsung CU8000 has better handling of reflections which is advantageous in well-lit environments but falls short with a lower motion processing performance, leading to blurrier action scenes in sports.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Hisense UX (LCD) and the Samsung CU8000 (LCD) compare to other TVs
"If you need a TV that can light up the room literally as well as figuratively, look no further than the Hisense UX"
Get a great deal on the Hisense UX (LCD) or the Samsung CU8000 (LCD)
About Hisense
Hisense, a Chinese TV manufacturer, entered the US market in approximately 2011 and has since acquired TV divisions from various companies such as Toshiba, Sharp, Hitachi, and NEC. Currently ranking as the fourth largest vendor in terms of sales volume, Hisense aims to capture a wide range of TV budget segments. They offer exceptional value with TVs that often outperform their competitors at similar price points, making them a compelling choice for consumers. In the US, they use Google TV as their smart TV software which provides the largest app selection and a very modern user interface, however it is not as user friendly as the software from other vendors.
About Samsung
Samsung, a South Korean electronics manufacturer, holds the title of being the largest global TV vendor in terms of units sold. They offer a diverse lineup of TV products that cater to various budget ranges. A notable achievement in recent years is the development of Quantum Dots, a technology that enhances color reproduction, resulting in richer and more vibrant hues. Samsung TVs are well-regarded for their high manufacturing quality and user-friendly software, making them an excellent choice for consumers seeking an intuitive viewing experience.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec TVs team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest TV information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
385
TVs evaluated
33,110
TVs stats compiled
21
Proprietary TVs ratings developed
122,130
Recommendations made
18,320
Consumer hours saved
About the TV team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and TVs Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Jaime Roldán
TVs Expert
Jaime is a Colombia-based TV expert. He is an electronics engineer with 8 years of experience in the telecom sector and has been making TV recommendations for 12 years.