A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Company ProductName Specs
Company ProductName Specs
What we think
The PerfectRec TV team Learn more
Updated April 10, 2024·
If you prefer a budget-friendly option and primarily watch news or daytime TV shows in a well-lit room, the Hisense A4H could suffice despite its overall poor performance in picture quality. However, if you are willing to invest in a higher quality viewing experience for movies, sports, and gaming, and you desire better performance in both dark and bright rooms, the LG C1 with its OLED screen and superior picture quality may be worth the higher cost. Keep in mind, the LG C1 also has better sound, a wider array of advanced features like support for multiple HDR formats, and a higher refresh rate that is beneficial for fast-paced content and gaming. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Hisense A4H (LCD)
- The Hisense A4H (LCD) has no clear advantages over the LG C1 (OLED).
Advantages of the LG C1 (OLED)
- Good for bright room
- Very good for dark room
- Excellent for gaming
- Very good for movies & TV
- Very good for sports
- Very good for news, talk, & other TV
- Very good for cartoons & animation
- Very good for use as monitor
- Very good for upscaling
- Very good motion processing
- Excellent viewing angle
- Excellent reflections
Key differences
Picture Quality
5.3
8.5
3.80/10
CONTRAST
10.00/10
6.3/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
7.2/10
LED
PANEL TYPE
WOLED
IPS
PANEL SUB-TYPE
WBC
The LG C1 (OLED) has very good picture quality, while the Hisense A4H (LCD) has poor picture quality.
Movies & TV
5.2
8.9
3.80/10
CONTRAST
10.00/10
5.5/10
BLACK UNIFORMITY
10.0/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
8.0/10
No
HDR10 SUPPORT
Yes
No
HDR10+ SUPPORT
No
No
DOLBY VISION SUPPORT
Yes
The LG C1 (OLED) is very good for movies & TV, while the Hisense A4H (LCD) is poor.
Sports
6.1
8.3
2.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
8.0/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
120Hz
8.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
10.0/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
8.0/10
5.7/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.0/10
No
HLG SUPPORT
Yes
The LG C1 (OLED) is very good for sports, while the Hisense A4H (LCD) is only fair.
Gaming
5.6
9.0
5.9/10
RESPONSE TIME SCORE
10.0/10
8.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
10.0/10
2.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
8.0/10
0.0/100
GAMING LOCAL DIMMING
100.0/100
2.5/10
GAME HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.2/10
The LG C1 (OLED) is excellent for gaming, while the Hisense A4H (LCD) is poor.
Cartoons & Animation
5.9
8.2
6.0/10
COLOR GAMUT SCORE
8.1/10
6.3/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
7.2/10
5.7/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.0/10
8.3/10
COLORS OUT OF THE BOX SCORE
7.2/10
7.7/10
GRAY UNIFORMITY
9.6/10
The LG C1 (OLED) is very good for cartoons & animation, while the Hisense A4H (LCD) is poor.
News, Talk, & Other TV
5.9
8.6
5.7/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.0/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
8.0/10
The LG C1 (OLED) is very good for news, talk, & other TV, while the Hisense A4H (LCD) is poor.
Bright Room
4.7
7.1
7.4/10
VIEWING ANGLE
9.3/10
5.7/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.0/10
2.5/10
HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
7.0/10
6.6/10
REFLECTIONS SCORE
9.2/10
The LG C1 (OLED) is good for bright room, while the Hisense A4H (LCD) is poor.
Cost
$178
$1,300
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
The Hisense A4H (LCD) has a price of $178 and the LG C1 (OLED) costs $1,300.
Let Us Help Find Your Perfect TV
Find your new TV
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Hisense A4H (LCD) and the LG C1 (OLED) compare to other TVs
Spec Comparison
 |  | |
| Hisense A4H (LCD) | LG C1 (OLED) |
GENERAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | |||
$178 | $1,300 | ||
Brand | |||
Brand | Hisense | LG | |
Release Date | |||
Release Date | May 3, 2022 | April 1, 2021 | |
Full name | |||
Full name | 43A4H | OLED48C1 | |
Screen Size | |||
Screen Size | 43" | 48" | |
Screen Resolution | |||
Screen Resolution | 1080P | 4K | |
TV FEATURES | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Operating System | |||
Operating System | Android TV | webOS | |
Sound Quality Score | |||
Sound Quality Score | 5.8/10 | 7.8/10 | |
NextGen Ready | |||
NextGen Ready | No | No | |
HDMI Ports | |||
HDMI Ports | 2 | 4 | |
Coax Ports | |||
Coax Ports | 1 | 1 | |
DISPLAY QUALITY SCORES | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Picture Quality Score | |||
Picture Quality Score | 5.3/10 | 8.5/10 | |
Bright Room Score | |||
Bright Room Score | 4.7/10 | 7.2/10 | |
Gaming Score | |||
Gaming Score | 5.7/10 | 9/10 | |
Movies & TV Score | |||
Movies & TV Score | 5.3/10 | 9/10 | |
Sports Score | |||
Sports Score | 6.1/10 | 8.4/10 | |
PHYSICAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Dimensions w/o Stand (H x W x D) | |||
Dimensions w/o Stand (H x W x D) | 22" x 37.6" x 3.4" | 24.3" x 42.2" x 1.8" | |
Dimensions with Stand (H x W) | |||
Dimensions with Stand (H x W) | 23.9" x 37.6" | 25.6" x 42.2" | |
Weight without Stand | |||
Weight without Stand | 14.1 lbs | 32.8 lbs | |
VESA Mount | |||
VESA Mount | 200 x 200 | 300 x 200 | |
DISPLAY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Color Depth | |||
Color Depth | 8 bit | 10 bit | |
Black Frame Insertion | |||
Black Frame Insertion | No | Yes | |
Auto Low Latency Mode | |||
Auto Low Latency Mode | No | Yes | |
Contrast | |||
Contrast | 3.8/10 | 10/10 | |
Local Dimming | |||
Local Dimming | 3.3/10 | 10/10 | |
SOUND | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Speaker Setup | |||
Speaker Setup | 2.0 | 2.2 | |
Speaker Power | |||
Speaker Power | 14 W | 40 W | |
Dolby Atmos | |||
Dolby Atmos | No | Yes | |
DTS:X | |||
DTS:X | Yes | No | |
Get a great deal on the Hisense A4H (LCD) or the LG C1 (OLED)
About Hisense
Hisense, a Chinese TV manufacturer, entered the US market in approximately 2011 and has since acquired TV divisions from various companies such as Toshiba, Sharp, Hitachi, and NEC. Currently ranking as the fourth largest vendor in terms of sales volume, Hisense aims to capture a wide range of TV budget segments. They offer exceptional value with TVs that often outperform their competitors at similar price points, making them a compelling choice for consumers. In the US, they use Google TV as their smart TV software which provides the largest app selection and a very modern user interface, however it is not as user friendly as the software from other vendors.
About LG
LG, a prominent TV brand from Korea, has played a significant role in popularizing OLED TVs. OLED technology is hailed as the future of TV technology. Their TVs employ WebOS, a proprietary smart TV software that not only offers seamless functionality but also includes gaming-specific features, earning praise from players worldwide. Often regarded as the gateway to unparalleled viewing experiences, LG's mid-range OLEDs come highly recommended, making them a worthwhile investment for those willing to stretch their budget for superior quality.
Give feedback
We're constantly perfecting our model
TV guides you might be interested in
More comparisons for you
FAQs
FAQs about TVs
Why trust us
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec TVs team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest TV information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
385
TVs evaluated
33,110
TVs stats compiled
21
Proprietary TVs ratings developed
121,530
Recommendations made
18,230
Consumer hours saved
About the TV team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and TVs Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Jaime Roldán
TVs Expert
Jaime is a Colombia-based TV expert. He is an electronics engineer with 8 years of experience in the telecom sector and has been making TV recommendations for 12 years.
Featured in
