If you're a competitive gamer valuing fast refresh rates and minimal ghosting, the MSI MAG 271QPX with its high refresh capabilities would be the better option. For an immersive experience in both gaming and media, the wider MSI MAG 341CQP offers an expansive screen with a high resolution, but keep in mind its refresh rate isn't as high as the 271QPX. Both monitors have excellent color performance for activities such as photo editing. The choice between them largely depends on whether you prioritize a higher refresh rate for competitive play or a larger, wider display for an immersive experience. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED)
Best in class for competitive gaming
Best in class refresh rate
Advantages of the MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED)
The MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) has no clear advantages over the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED).
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
10.0/10
5.8/10
360Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
0.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
48 - 360 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 175 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
The MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) is poor.
Cost
$750
$800
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
The MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) has a price of $750 and the MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) costs $800.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
10.0/10
9.9/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
360Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
99.1 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.3 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) and MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.
Productivity
6.0/10
5.9/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
110 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) to be only fair for productivity, while the MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) is poor.
Media Consumption
9.8/10
9.8/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) and MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) are both best in class for media consumption.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
Yes
Both the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) and MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) and MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
Yes
Yes
Both the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) and MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) are suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) and MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) and the MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) compare to other monitors
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
127,100
Recommendations made
19,065
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.