A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
39GS95QE
Company ProductName Specs




MAG 271QPX
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 22, 2024·

If you prioritize a larger screen and use your monitor for tasks like digital photo editing, the LG monitor offers a bigger display that can enhance your experience. For competitive gaming, the MSI monitor, despite being smaller, offers a higher refresh rate that benefits fast-paced games. It also excels in HDR video editing and media consumption due to its superb contrast and color gamut. The MSI is less expensive, offers excellent performance for various gaming and media tasks, and is suitable for productivity as well. If budget is a concern and you need a well-rounded monitor, the MSI may be the better choice. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED)
  • The LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) has no clear advantages over the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED).
Advantages of the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED)
  • Best in class for competitive gaming
  • Best in class for media consumption
  • Best in class refresh rate
  • Good image clarity
  • Best in class brightness
  • Best in class color volume

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

6.3
39GS95QE
MAG 271QPX
10.0
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
360Hz
0.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
48 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 360 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
275 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
The MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) is only fair.

Productivity

5.4
39GS95QE
MAG 271QPX
6.0
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
102 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) is only fair for productivity, while the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

7.6
39GS95QE
MAG 271QPX
9.8
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
275 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) is good.

Cost

$1,500
39GS95QE
MAG 271QPX
$750
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

The LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) has a price of $1,500 and the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) costs $750.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
39GS95QE
MAG 271QPX
Yes
The LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.7
39GS95QE
MAG 271QPX
10.0
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
360Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
275 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
98.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.1 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) and LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
39GS95QE
MAG 271QPX
Yes
Both the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) and MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
39GS95QE
MAG 271QPX
Yes
Both the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) and MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
39GS95QE
MAG 271QPX
Yes
Both the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) and MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) and the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED)MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED)
LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED)MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,500
$750
Screen Size
39"27"
Resolution
3440 x 1440 2560 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDQD-OLED
Refresh Rate
240Hz360Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
275 nits1000 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
Unknown138.4 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.03 ms0.03 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 240 Hz48 - 360 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/109.5/10
Ghosting Score
10/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
102 PPI110 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.4/106.6/10
Image Clarity Score
6.7/107.1/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
00
HDMI 2.1 Ports
22
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,600
Recommendations made
16,140
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo