A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
38WN95C
Company ProductName Specs




45GS96QB
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 23, 2024·

If you prioritize a wider color gamut for tasks like digital photo editing and value a more consistent brightness level, the LG 38WN95C with its IPS panel may suit you better, especially if saving a bit of money is also important. However, if deep blacks and high contrast are crucial for your HDR gaming and media consumption, and you're focused more on competitive gaming with faster response times, the MSI 45GS96QB with its W-OLED panel is a solid choice, despite being generally more expensive. Keep in mind, though, that the MSI may not be as suitable for productivity due to possible issues with text clarity and image sharpness. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 38WN95C (IPS)
  • Good text clarity
  • Good image clarity
  • Good brightness
Advantages of the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class response time

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

6.1
38WN95C
45GS96QB
9.5
3840 x 1600
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
898:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
477 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
692 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
94.1 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 38WN95C (IPS) is only fair.

Competitive Gaming

4.5
38WN95C
45GS96QB
5.9
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
7.1 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
20 - 144 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
477 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
The MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) and LG 38WN95C (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Productivity

6.6
38WN95C
45GS96QB
2.7
3840 x 1600
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
111 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 38WN95C (IPS) is only fair for productivity, while the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

6.2
38WN95C
45GS96QB
5.4
3840 x 1600
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
898:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
477 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
692 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 38WN95C (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) is poor.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
38WN95C
45GS96QB
Yes
The LG 38WN95C (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Print Photo Editing

No
38WN95C
45GS96QB
Yes
The LG 38WN95C (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Cost

$1,600
38WN95C
45GS96QB
$1,700
Product imageProduct image

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

The LG 38WN95C (IPS) has a price of $1,600 and the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) costs $1,700.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
38WN95C
45GS96QB
Yes
Both the LG 38WN95C (IPS) and MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
38WN95C
45GS96QB
No
Both the LG 38WN95C (IPS) and MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 38WN95C (IPS) and the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 38WN95C (IPS)MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED)
LG 38WN95C (IPS)MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,600
$1,700
Screen Size
38"45"
Resolution
3840 x 16003440 x 1440
Screen Type
LEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSW-OLED
Local Dimming Zones
4N/A

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
898:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
477 nits275 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
692 nitsUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoYes
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %Unknown

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
7.1 ms0.03 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 144 Hz48 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
6.6/108/10
Ghosting Score
7.9/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
111 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
7.2/101.4/10
Image Clarity Score
7.2/102.5/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
20
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
127,100
Recommendations made
19,065
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo