A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
32GS95UE
Company ProductName Specs




27E1N8900
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 22, 2024·

If you prioritize a larger screen and better performance for competitive gaming, the LG 32GS95UE with its high refresh rate is a strong option, but keep in mind it's not the best for productivity or casual gaming due to lower image clarity and text quality. Conversely, the Philips 27E1N8900 offers sharper text and better image clarity for productivity and media consumption at a lower price, though it falls short in gaming capabilities. The Philips is also superior for digital and print photo editing, making it a better choice if your work revolves around visual accuracy. Both are OLED with excellent contrast and color depth, but if budget is a concern, the Philips provides a balance of features for less. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)
  • Good for productivity
  • Very good refresh rate
Advantages of the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for media consumption
  • Very good image clarity
  • Good brightness

Key differences

Chevron down

Media Consumption

8.5
32GS95UE
27E1N8900
9.5
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
275 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
540 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is very good.

Cost

$1,400
32GS95UE
27E1N8900
$800
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) has a price of $1,400 and the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) costs $800.

Digital Photo Editing

No
32GS95UE
27E1N8900
Yes
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing while the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.7
32GS95UE
27E1N8900
9.7
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
275 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
540 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
98.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.7 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) and Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Competitive Gaming

6.2
32GS95UE
27E1N8900
5.9
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
0.3 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.1 ms
48 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
275 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
540 nits
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) to be only fair for competitive gaming, while the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) is poor.

Productivity

7.0
32GS95UE
27E1N8900
6.9
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
140 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
163 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) to be good for productivity, while the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) is only fair.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
32GS95UE
27E1N8900
Yes
Both the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) and Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
32GS95UE
27E1N8900
No
Both the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) and Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
32GS95UE
27E1N8900
Yes
Both the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) and Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) and the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED)
LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,400
$800
Screen Size
32"27"
Resolution
3840 x 21603840 x 2160
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDW-OLED
Refresh Rate
240Hz60Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
275 nits540 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
98.5 %150 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.3 ms0.1 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 240 HzN/A
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/105/10
Ghosting Score
9.9/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
140 PPI163 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.9/106.9/10
Image Clarity Score
8/108/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
02
HDMI 2.1 Ports
20
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
118,100
Recommendations made
17,715
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo