A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
32GS95UE
Company ProductName Specs




MAG 341CQP
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 22, 2024·

If you're seeking an exceptional gaming experience with smooth motion and are willing to invest in a high-end monitor, the LG 32GS95UE with its higher refresh rate and lower total response time will be well-suited for competitive gaming. However, if you require a monitor that excels in productivity due to a larger screen and ultra-wide aspect ratio, is great for media consumption with high color accuracy, and also offers excellent gaming performance at a lower cost, the MSI MAG 341CQP stands out as a strong choice, especially if you're also interested in HDR video editing and print photo editing. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)
  • Good for productivity
  • Very good refresh rate
Advantages of the MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED)
  • Best in class for media consumption
  • Best in class brightness
  • Best in class color volume

Key differences

Chevron down

Productivity

7.0
32GS95UE
MAG 341CQP
5.9
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
140 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is good for productivity, while the MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

8.5
32GS95UE
MAG 341CQP
9.8
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
275 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is very good.

Cost

$1,100
32GS95UE
MAG 341CQP
$800
Product image
Product image

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

$1,800

The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) has a price of $1,100 and the MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) costs $800.

Digital Photo Editing

No
32GS95UE
MAG 341CQP
Yes
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing while the MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
32GS95UE
MAG 341CQP
Yes
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.7
32GS95UE
MAG 341CQP
9.9
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
275 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
98.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.3 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) and LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Competitive Gaming

6.2
32GS95UE
MAG 341CQP
5.8
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
0.3 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
48 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 175 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
275 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) to be only fair for competitive gaming, while the MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) is poor.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
32GS95UE
MAG 341CQP
Yes
Both the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) and MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
32GS95UE
MAG 341CQP
Yes
Both the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) and MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) and the MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED)
LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,100
$800
Screen Size
32"34"
Resolution
3840 x 21603440 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDQD-OLED
Refresh Rate
240Hz175Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
275 nits1000 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
98.5 %139.1 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.3 ms0.03 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 240 Hz48 - 175 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/107.2/10
Ghosting Score
9.9/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
140 PPI109 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.9/106.6/10
Image Clarity Score
8/107/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
00
HDMI 2.1 Ports
22
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo