A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Company ProductName Specs
Company ProductName Specs
What we think
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·
If you're a competitive gamer looking for fast response times and higher refresh rates, the LG 32GQ850 is a superior choice. However, it doesn't offer the best experience for HDR gaming and media consumption. On the other hand, if you're focused on productivity and need a wider screen for multitasking, the LG 34WQ73A with its ultra-wide aspect ratio will serve you better, and it's typically less costly. The 34WQ73A also has a sharper text quality, making it more suitable for general use, but it's not the best option for fast-paced gaming due to its lower refresh rate. If digital photo editing is important, both screens support a wide color gamut, but only the 32GQ850 is recommended for print photo editing. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 32GQ850 (IPS)
- Very good refresh rate
Advantages of the LG 34WQ73A (IPS)
- Good text clarity
- Good image clarity
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
5.2
3.8
260Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
8.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
10.0 ms
48 - 260 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
150 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The LG 32GQ850 (IPS) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is somewhat better.
Productivity
5.0
6.0
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
93 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is only fair for productivity, while the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
5.3
5.9
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
150 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
600 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 34WQ73A (IPS) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are both poor for media consumption, though the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is somewhat better.
Cost
$718
$400
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
The LG 32GQ850 (IPS) has a price of $718 and the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) costs $400.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
No
The LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is not suitable for digital photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
5.8
5.8
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
260Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
150 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
600 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
98.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GQ850 (IPS) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are both poor for casual gaming.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) and the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) compare to other monitors
Spec Comparison
 |  | |
| LG 32GQ850 (IPS) | LG 34WQ73A (IPS) |
GENERAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | |||
$718 | $400 | ||
Screen Size | |||
Screen Size | 32" | 34" | |
Resolution | |||
Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 3440 x 1440 | |
Screen Type | |||
Screen Type | LED | LED | |
Screen Sub-type | |||
Screen Sub-type | IPS | IPS | |
Local Dimming Zones | |||
Local Dimming Zones | 16 | N/A | |
COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Native Contrast | |||
Native Contrast | 1000:1 | 1000:1 | |
SDR Peak Brightness | |||
SDR Peak Brightness | 150 nits | 300 nits | |
HDR Peak Brightness | |||
HDR Peak Brightness | 600 nits | Unknown | |
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | |||
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | No | No | |
sRGB Color Gamut | |||
sRGB Color Gamut | 135 % | 99 % | |
MOTION CHARACTERISTICS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Total Response Time | |||
Total Response Time | 8 ms | 10 ms | |
Variable Refresh Rate | |||
Variable Refresh Rate | 48 - 260 Hz | N/A | |
Strobing / BFI | |||
Strobing / BFI | No | No | |
Persistence Blur Score | |||
Persistence Blur Score | 8.3/10 | 5/10 | |
Ghosting Score | |||
Ghosting Score | 7.6/10 | 7.1/10 | |
TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Pixels Per Inch | |||
Pixels Per Inch | 93 PPI | 110 PPI | |
Coating | |||
Coating | Matte | Matte | |
Text Clarity Score | |||
Text Clarity Score | 6.3/10 | 7.1/10 | |
Image Clarity Score | |||
Image Clarity Score | 6.3/10 | 7.1/10 | |
PORTS & CONNECTIVITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
HDMI 1.4 Ports | |||
HDMI 1.4 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
HDMI 2.0 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.0 Ports | 0 | 2 | |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 1 | 0 | |
Micro HDMI Ports | |||
Micro HDMI Ports | 0 | 0 | |
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | |||
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
Give feedback
We're constantly perfecting our model
More comparisons for you
Compare LG 32GQ850 (IPS) vs. Innocn 27M2V (IPS MiniLED)
VS
Compare LG 32GQ850 (IPS) vs. Acer X34V (QD-OLED)
VS
Compare LG 32GQ850 (IPS) vs. AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED)
VS
Compare LG 34WQ73A (IPS) vs. Dell S2722QC (IPS)
VS
Compare LG 34WQ73A (IPS) vs. Asus PA279CV (IPS)
VS
Compare LG 34WQ73A (IPS) vs. LG 27GP850 (IPS)
VS
FAQs
Why trust us
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Featured in
