If you prioritize a more immersive experience for competitive gaming, the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) with its wider screen and exceptional contrast might be the better option, but it comes at a premium price. On the other hand, the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) offers a larger color gamut for tasks like digital photo editing at a lower price point, yet it may not provide the same level of clarity and contrast for HDR gaming and media as the OLED model. If budget is a concern and you need a versatile monitor for both productivity and casual gaming, the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) could serve well. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 32GQ850 (IPS)
The LG 32GQ850 (IPS) has no clear advantages over the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED).
Advantages of the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED)
Best in class for casual gaming
Good for media consumption
Good image clarity
Best in class contrast
Best in class response time
Key differences
Casual Gaming
5.8/10
9.7/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
260Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
150 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
600 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
98.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is poor.
Competitive Gaming
5.2/10
6.3/10
260Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
8.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
48 - 260 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
150 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
The LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
5.0/10
5.7/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
93 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are both poor for productivity, though the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) is somewhat better.
Media Consumption
5.3/10
7.8/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
150 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
600 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$718
$1,300
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
The LG 32GQ850 (IPS) has a price of $718 and the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) costs $1,300.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
Yes
The LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Key similarities
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) and LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) and LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) and LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) and the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) compare to other monitors
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.