A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
32GP850
Company ProductName Specs




XG321UG
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 23, 2024·

If budget is a concern and you enjoy casual gaming and digital photo editing, the LG 32GP850 with its good refresh rate and color accuracy is a solid choice. Alternatively, if you're willing to invest more for an enhanced experience in productivity tasks, HDR video editing, and a sharper image due to higher resolution, the ViewSonic XG321UG would suit your needs, although it may not be as well-suited for competitive gaming due to its response time. Both monitors offer large screen size and good color depth, but the ViewSonic has a significant advantage in HDR peak brightness, which enhances HDR content viewing. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 32GP850 (IPS)
  • Good refresh rate
Advantages of the ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED)
  • Good for productivity
  • Good text clarity
  • Good image clarity

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.8
32GP850
XG321UG
6.4
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 2160
180Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
1037:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
412 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
430 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1400 nits
95.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
Matte
COATING
Matte
The ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) is only fair for casual gaming, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.

Productivity

5.0
32GP850
XG321UG
7.9
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 2160
93 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
137 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) is good for productivity, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.

Media Consumption

5.5
32GP850
XG321UG
6.7
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 2160
1037:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
412 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
430 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1400 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) is only fair for media consumption, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$600
32GP850
XG321UG
$2,300
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

$3,500

The LG 32GP850 (IPS) has a price of $600 and the ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) costs $2,300.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
32GP850
XG321UG
No
The LG 32GP850 (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing while the ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) is not suitable for digital photo editing.

Print Photo Editing

No
32GP850
XG321UG
Yes
The LG 32GP850 (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

4.8
32GP850
XG321UG
4.6
180Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
6.2 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
3.6 ms
20 - 180 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48,144 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
No
412 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
The LG 32GP850 (IPS) and ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) are both poor for competitive gaming.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
32GP850
XG321UG
No
Both the LG 32GP850 (IPS) and ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
32GP850
XG321UG
No
Both the LG 32GP850 (IPS) and ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 32GP850 (IPS) and the ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 32GP850 (IPS)ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED)
LG 32GP850 (IPS)ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED)

GENERAL

Price
$600
$2,300
Screen Size
32"32"
Resolution
2560 x 14403440 x 2160
Screen Type
LEDMini LED
Screen Sub-type
IPSIPS
Local Dimming Zones
N/A1152

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1037:11000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
412 nits400 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
430 nits1400 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoNo
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
6.2 ms3.6 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 180 Hz48,144 Hz
Strobing / BFI
YesNo
Persistence Blur Score
7.3/106.6/10
Ghosting Score
8/108.4/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
93 PPI137 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.3/107.9/10
Image Clarity Score
6.3/107.9/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
10
HDMI 2.0 Ports
22
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo