If budget is a concern and you enjoy casual gaming and digital photo editing, the LG 32GP850 with its good refresh rate and color accuracy is a solid choice. Alternatively, if you're willing to invest more for an enhanced experience in productivity tasks, HDR video editing, and a sharper image due to higher resolution, the ViewSonic XG321UG would suit your needs, although it may not be as well-suited for competitive gaming due to its response time. Both monitors offer large screen size and good color depth, but the ViewSonic has a significant advantage in HDR peak brightness, which enhances HDR content viewing. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 32GP850 (IPS)
Good refresh rate
Advantages of the ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED)
Good for productivity
Good text clarity
Good image clarity
Key differences
Casual Gaming
5.8/10
6.4/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 2160
180Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
1037:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
412 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
430 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1400 nits
95.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
Matte
COATING
Matte
The ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) is only fair for casual gaming, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
5.0/10
7.9/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 2160
93 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
137 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) is good for productivity, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
5.5/10
6.7/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 2160
1037:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
412 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
430 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1400 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) is only fair for media consumption, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$600
$2,300
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
The LG 32GP850 (IPS) has a price of $600 and the ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) costs $2,300.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
No
The LG 32GP850 (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing while the ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) is not suitable for digital photo editing.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The LG 32GP850 (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Competitive Gaming
4.8/10
4.6/10
180Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
6.2 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
3.6 ms
20 - 180 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48,144 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
No
412 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
The LG 32GP850 (IPS) and ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) are both poor for competitive gaming.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the LG 32GP850 (IPS) and ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the LG 32GP850 (IPS) and ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the LG 32GP850 (IPS) and the ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) compare to other monitors
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.