A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
32GP850
Company ProductName Specs




DualUp 28MQ780
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

Considering budget and use cases, the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is a better choice for casual and competitive gaming due to its higher refresh rate and support for variable refresh rate, reducing screen tearing and providing smoother gameplay. However, its lower peak brightness and contrast may not provide the best HDR gaming or media consumption experience. The LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) has a unique screen aspect ratio better suited for productivity with its ability to display more vertical content, but it lacks in gaming performance with a lower refresh rate and no variable refresh rate support. Its superior vertical resolution offers sharper text and image clarity, making it a good choice for digital photo editing, but not as suitable for HDR video editing or print photo editing. If gaming is a priority and budget is a concern, the 32GP850 is a better fit, while the DualUp is tailored more towards productivity and multitasking. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 32GP850 (IPS)
  • Good refresh rate
  • Good brightness
  • Very good response time
Advantages of the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS)
  • Good for productivity
  • Good text clarity
  • Good image clarity

Key differences

Chevron down

Productivity

5.0
32GP850
DualUp 28MQ780
7.7
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 2880
93 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
139 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) is good for productivity, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.

Media Consumption

5.5
32GP850
DualUp 28MQ780
6.5
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 2880
1037:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
412 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
430 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.8
32GP850
DualUp 28MQ780
5.8
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 2880
180Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
1037:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
412 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
430 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
95.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GP850 (IPS) and LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) are both poor for casual gaming.

Competitive Gaming

4.8
32GP850
DualUp 28MQ780
4.9
180Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
6.2 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
10.0 ms
20 - 180 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
Yes
STROBING / BFI
No
412 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming.

Cost

$600
32GP850
DualUp 28MQ780
$600
Product imageProduct image

$300

$400

$500

$600

$700

$800

$900

The LG 32GP850 (IPS) has a price of $600 and the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) costs $600.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
32GP850
DualUp 28MQ780
No
Both the LG 32GP850 (IPS) and LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
32GP850
DualUp 28MQ780
Yes
Both the LG 32GP850 (IPS) and LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
32GP850
DualUp 28MQ780
No
Both the LG 32GP850 (IPS) and LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

No
32GP850
DualUp 28MQ780
No
Both the LG 32GP850 (IPS) and LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 32GP850 (IPS) and the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 32GP850 (IPS)LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS)
LG 32GP850 (IPS)LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$600
$600
Screen Size
32"28"
Resolution
2560 x 14402560 x 2880
Screen Type
LEDLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSIPS
Refresh Rate
180Hz60Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1037:11000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
412 nits300 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
430 nitsUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoNo
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
6.2 ms10 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 180 HzN/A
Strobing / BFI
YesNo
Persistence Blur Score
7.3/105/10
Ghosting Score
8/107.1/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
93 PPI139 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.3/107.9/10
Image Clarity Score
6.3/107.9/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
10
HDMI 2.0 Ports
22
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
97,400
Recommendations made
14,610
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo