A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
32GP850
Company ProductName Specs




39GS95QE
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 23, 2024·

If you're on a tighter budget and mainly interested in digital photo editing with accurate colors within the sRGB spectrum, the LG 32GP850 with its IPS panel is a solid choice. However, if you're willing to invest more for an immersive gaming and media consumption experience with a wider aspect ratio, infinite contrast, and deeper blacks thanks to its W-OLED technology, the LG 39GS95QE would be a better fit, though it may not offer the best value for productivity due to its curvature and ultra-wide screen. Keep in mind that the OLED monitor would generally excel in HDR content. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 32GP850 (IPS)
  • Good brightness
Advantages of the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Good for media consumption
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class response time

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.8
32GP850
39GS95QE
9.7
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
180Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1037:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
412 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
430 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
95.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.

Competitive Gaming

4.8
32GP850
39GS95QE
6.3
180Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
6.2 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
20 - 180 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
No
412 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
The LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.

Media Consumption

5.5
32GP850
39GS95QE
7.6
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
1037:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
412 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
430 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$600
32GP850
39GS95QE
$1,500
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

The LG 32GP850 (IPS) has a price of $600 and the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) costs $1,500.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
32GP850
39GS95QE
Yes
The LG 32GP850 (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Print Photo Editing

No
32GP850
39GS95QE
Yes
The LG 32GP850 (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Productivity

5.0
32GP850
39GS95QE
5.4
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
93 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
102 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are both poor for productivity.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
32GP850
39GS95QE
Yes
Both the LG 32GP850 (IPS) and LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
32GP850
39GS95QE
No
Both the LG 32GP850 (IPS) and LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 32GP850 (IPS) and the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 32GP850 (IPS)LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED)
LG 32GP850 (IPS)LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$600
$1,500
Screen Size
32"39"
Resolution
2560 x 14403440 x 1440
Screen Type
LEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSW-OLED
Refresh Rate
180Hz240Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1037:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
412 nits275 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
430 nitsUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoYes
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %Unknown

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
6.2 ms0.03 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 180 Hz48 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
YesNo
Persistence Blur Score
7.3/108/10
Ghosting Score
8/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
93 PPI102 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.3/106.4/10
Image Clarity Score
6.3/106.7/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
10
HDMI 2.0 Ports
20
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo