If budget is a concern and you engage in competitive gaming, the LG 32GP850 is a suitable choice with its high refresh rate and decent gaming performance. However, for a wider screen and better productivity due to more workspace, the LG 38WN95C offers a larger, ultra-wide display which can enhance multitasking and media consumption experiences, although at a higher cost. Neither are the best for HDR gaming or professional color work, but for digital photo editing, they provide adequate color coverage. The LG 32GP850 has some strengths in gaming with faster response times and variable refresh rate features. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 32GP850 (IPS)
Good refresh rate
Very good response time
Advantages of the LG 38WN95C (IPS)
Good text clarity
Good image clarity
Key differences
Productivity
5.0/10
6.6/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 1600
93 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
111 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 38WN95C (IPS) is only fair for productivity, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
5.5/10
6.2/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 1600
1037:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
898:1
412 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
477 nits
430 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
692 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 38WN95C (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$600
$950
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
The LG 32GP850 (IPS) has a price of $600 and the LG 38WN95C (IPS) costs $950.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
5.8/10
6.1/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 1600
180Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
1037:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
898:1
412 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
477 nits
430 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
692 nits
95.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
94.1 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers LG 38WN95C (IPS) to be only fair for casual gaming, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.
Competitive Gaming
4.8/10
4.5/10
180Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
6.2 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
7.1 ms
20 - 180 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 144 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
No
412 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
477 nits
The LG 32GP850 (IPS) and LG 38WN95C (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the LG 32GP850 (IPS) and LG 38WN95C (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the LG 32GP850 (IPS) and LG 38WN95C (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the LG 32GP850 (IPS) and LG 38WN95C (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the LG 32GP850 (IPS) and LG 38WN95C (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the LG 32GP850 (IPS) and the LG 38WN95C (IPS) compare to other monitors
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.