A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
27GS95QE
Company ProductName Specs




34WQ75C
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If exceptional gaming performance is a priority, the LG 27GS95QE with its W-OLED panel and high refresh rate offers smooth motion and excellent contrast, ideal for immersive HDR gaming. However, for general productivity and print photo editing, the LG 34WQ75C's larger IPS screen with a wider aspect ratio can provide more screen real estate, better viewing angles, and higher text clarity. If you often work with digital photos, the LG 27GS95QE's accurate colors would be beneficial, but if cost is a concern and you value workspace and adequate performance for casual gaming and media, the LG 34WQ75C is a more budget-friendly choice. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Best in class for competitive gaming
  • Good for media consumption
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class response time
Advantages of the LG 34WQ75C (IPS)
  • Good text clarity

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.6
27GS95QE
34WQ75C
5.8
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
196 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
636 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
72.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
85.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is poor.

Competitive Gaming

9.5
27GS95QE
34WQ75C
3.8
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
0.5 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
5.0 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
196 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is poor.

Media Consumption

7.7
27GS95QE
34WQ75C
5.9
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
196 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
636 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$650
27GS95QE
34WQ75C
$600
Product image
Product image

$300

$400

$500

$600

$700

$800

$900

$1,000

The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) has a price of $650 and the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) costs $600.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
27GS95QE
34WQ75C
No
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
27GS95QE
34WQ75C
No
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is not suitable for digital photo editing.

Print Photo Editing

No
27GS95QE
34WQ75C
Yes
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Productivity

5.8
27GS95QE
34WQ75C
6.0
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
111 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers LG 34WQ75C (IPS) to be only fair for productivity, while the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is poor.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
27GS95QE
34WQ75C
No
Both the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) and the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED)LG 34WQ75C (IPS)
LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED)LG 34WQ75C (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$650
$600
Screen Size
27"34"
Resolution
2560 x 14403440 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDIPS
Refresh Rate
240Hz60Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:11000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
196 nits300 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
636 nitsUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesNo
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %99 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.5 ms5 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 240 HzN/A
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/105/10
Ghosting Score
9.8/108.2/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
111 PPI110 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.7/107.1/10
Image Clarity Score
7.2/107.1/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
02
HDMI 2.1 Ports
20
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,600
Recommendations made
17,490
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo