A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
27GS95QE
Company ProductName Specs




32GQ850
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

For an immersive gaming and media consumption experience with deep blacks and vibrant colors, the LG 27GS95QE with its OLED panel is a better pick but it falls short in productivity due to potentially less image clarity and text quality. In contrast, the LG 32GQ850 offers a larger screen and is more suitable for productivity and digital photo editing with its more accurate colors, but it won't deliver the same level of contrast and HDR performance as the OLED option. If you prioritize gaming and watching HDR content and are willing to invest more, the LG 27GS95QE may be your choice, otherwise for a balanced mix of gaming, productivity, and creative work, the LG 32GQ850 at a slightly lower price point could be more appropriate. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Best in class for competitive gaming
  • Good for media consumption
  • Good image clarity
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class response time
Advantages of the LG 32GQ850 (IPS)
  • The LG 32GQ850 (IPS) has no clear advantages over the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED).

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.6
27GS95QE
32GQ850
5.8
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
260Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
196 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
150 nits
636 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
72.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is poor.

Competitive Gaming

9.5
27GS95QE
32GQ850
5.2
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
260Hz
0.5 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.0 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 260 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
196 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
150 nits
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is poor.

Productivity

5.8
27GS95QE
32GQ850
5.0
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
111 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are both poor for productivity, though the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Media Consumption

7.7
27GS95QE
32GQ850
5.3
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
196 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
150 nits
636 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is poor.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
27GS95QE
32GQ850
No
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Print Photo Editing

No
27GS95QE
32GQ850
Yes
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Cost

$700
27GS95QE
32GQ850
$718
Product imageProduct image

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) has a price of $700 and the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) costs $718.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
27GS95QE
32GQ850
Yes
Both the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
27GS95QE
32GQ850
No
Both the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) and the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED)LG 32GQ850 (IPS)
LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED)LG 32GQ850 (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$700
$718
Screen Size
27"32"
Resolution
2560 x 14402560 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDIPS
Local Dimming Zones
N/A16

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:11000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
196 nits150 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
636 nits600 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesNo
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %135 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.5 ms8 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 240 Hz48 - 260 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/108.3/10
Ghosting Score
9.8/107.6/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
111 PPI93 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.7/106.3/10
Image Clarity Score
7.2/106.3/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
00
HDMI 2.1 Ports
21
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
106,100
Recommendations made
15,915
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo