If you prioritize high-quality visuals for HDR gaming and media consumption, the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) with its superior contrast and color depth might be worth the extra investment, but it's not as well-suited for general productivity. On the other hand, if you're looking for a larger screen and a more budget-friendly option that still performs well for casual and competitive gaming as well as digital photo editing, the LG 32GP850 (IPS) could meet your needs but won't provide the same level of HDR experience or peak brightness as the OLED model. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED)
Best in class for casual gaming
Best in class for competitive gaming
Good for media consumption
Very good refresh rate
Good image clarity
Best in class contrast
Best in class response time
Advantages of the LG 32GP850 (IPS)
Good brightness
Key differences
Casual Gaming
9.6/10
5.8/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1037:1
196 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
636 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
430 nits
72.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
95.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.
Competitive Gaming
9.5/10
4.8/10
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
0.5 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
6.2 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 180 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
196 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
5.8/10
5.0/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
111 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are both poor for productivity, though the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is somewhat better.
Media Consumption
7.7/10
5.5/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1037:1
196 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
636 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
430 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$650
$600
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
$1,000
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) has a price of $650 and the LG 32GP850 (IPS) costs $600.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
No
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Key similarities
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) and the LG 32GP850 (IPS) compare to other monitors
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,600
Recommendations made
17,490
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.