A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
27GR95QL
Company ProductName Specs




MEG 342C
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 22, 2024·

If you prioritize competitive gaming and a higher refresh rate, the LG 27GR95QL may better suit your needs. However, if you're looking for a wider display and better media consumption experience due to better color coverage and a higher resolution, the MSI MEG 342C may be the better option. The MSI also has a USB hub with power delivery, which could be useful for connecting and charging devices. Both are OLED and provide excellent contrast and color depth, but the LG has a matte screen which is preferred if you're concerned about reflections. Remember, the LG might be a bit pricier, so consider whether its advantages align with your specific use cases. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for competitive gaming
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Good brightness
Advantages of the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED)
  • Excellent for media consumption
  • Good image clarity
  • Best in class color volume

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

9.6
27GR95QL
MEG 342C
5.1
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
0.3 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
1.4 ms
48 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 175 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
600 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
236 nits
The LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

8.2
27GR95QL
MEG 342C
9.4
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
600 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
236 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
446 nits
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is excellent for media consumption, while the LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) is very good.

Cost

$992
27GR95QL
MEG 342C
$850
Product image
Product image

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

The LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) has a price of $992 and the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) costs $850.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
27GR95QL
MEG 342C
No
The LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing while the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing.

Print Photo Editing

No
27GR95QL
MEG 342C
Yes
The LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.8
27GR95QL
MEG 342C
9.5
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
600 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
236 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
446 nits
98.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.5 %
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) and MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Productivity

5.8
27GR95QL
MEG 342C
5.7
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
108 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) and MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) are both poor for productivity.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
27GR95QL
MEG 342C
Yes
Both the LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) and MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
27GR95QL
MEG 342C
No
Both the LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) and MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) and the MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED)MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED)
LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED)MSI MEG 342C (QD-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$992
$850
Screen Size
27"34"
Resolution
2560 x 14403440 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDQD-OLED
Refresh Rate
240Hz175Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
600 nits236 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
Unknown446 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %98.9 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.3 ms1.4 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 240 Hz20 - 175 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/107.2/10
Ghosting Score
9.9/109.5/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
108 PPI110 PPI
Coating
MatteGlossy
Text Clarity Score
6.6/106.6/10
Image Clarity Score
7/107.1/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
00
HDMI 2.1 Ports
22
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo