If you're a competitive gamer looking for fast response times and higher refresh rates, the LG 27GR95QL with its OLED panel offers superior contrast and reduced ghosting, but might not be as sharp for productivity tasks due to its lower resolution. Conversely, the LG 32GQ950 with its larger IPS display provides a higher resolution which is great for productivity and media consumption, and while it has a good refresh rate for gaming, it may not match the performance of the OLED in fast-paced games. Both are premium priced, so your budget will also be a factor in your decision. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED)
Best in class for casual gaming
Best in class for competitive gaming
Very good for media consumption
Very good refresh rate
Best in class contrast
Good brightness
Best in class response time
Advantages of the LG 32GQ950 (IPS)
Very good for productivity
Good text clarity
Good image clarity
Key differences
Casual Gaming
9.8/10
6.2/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
160Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
921:1
600 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
367 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1007 nits
98.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
94.6 %
Matte
COATING
Semi-Gloss
The LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is only fair.
Competitive Gaming
9.6/10
4.7/10
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
160Hz
0.3 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
5.8 ms
48 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 160 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
600 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
367 nits
The LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
5.8/10
8.1/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
108 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
139 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Semi-Gloss
The LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is very good for productivity, while the LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) is poor.
Media Consumption
8.2/10
6.6/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
921:1
600 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
367 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1007 nits
Matte
COATING
Semi-Gloss
The LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) is very good for media consumption, while the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is only fair.
Cost
$992
$930
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
The LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) has a price of $992 and the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) costs $930.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
No
The LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Key similarities
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) and LG 32GQ950 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) and LG 32GQ950 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) and LG 32GQ950 (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) and the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) compare to other monitors
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.