If you prioritize a sharper image and better text clarity for tasks like reading or detailed work, the LG 27GP83B with its higher pixels per inch would serve you better. However, if you prefer a larger screen for an immersive gaming or media experience, the LG 32GP850 may be more appealing, though the image won't be as sharp due to the lower pixel density. Both monitors offer good refresh rates for smooth gameplay, but neither is ideal for high dynamic range (HDR) gaming and media due to limited brightness and color volume. For color-critical work like digital photo editing, both are suitable. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 27GP83B (IPS)
Good text clarity
Good image clarity
Advantages of the LG 32GP850 (IPS)
Good brightness
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
6.0/10
4.8/10
180Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
6.8 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
6.2 ms
20 - 180 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 180 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
Yes
365 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
The LG 27GP83B (IPS) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
6.2/10
5.0/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27GP83B (IPS) is only fair for productivity, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$389
$434
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
The LG 27GP83B (IPS) has a price of $389 and the LG 32GP850 (IPS) costs $434.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
6.0/10
5.8/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
180Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
807:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1037:1
365 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
472 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
430 nits
95.6 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
95.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers LG 27GP83B (IPS) to be only fair for casual gaming, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
5.9/10
5.5/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
807:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1037:1
365 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
472 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
430 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27GP83B (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are both poor for media consumption.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the LG 27GP83B (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the LG 27GP83B (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the LG 27GP83B (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the LG 27GP83B (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the LG 27GP83B (IPS) and the LG 32GP850 (IPS) compare to other monitors
"The LG 27GP83B-B offers today’s sweet spot in gaming specs and capabilities in a well-designed premium package. It’s the first 1440p upgrade over the previous releases such as the LG 27GL83A-B with improvements in image quality thanks to its Nano IPS panel."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
94,100
Recommendations made
14,115
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.