A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
27EQ850
Company ProductName Specs




32GQ850
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 12, 2024·

If superior image quality and deep contrasts for HDR gaming and print photo editing are vital, the LG 27EQ850 with its OLED technology is the better choice. However, if you prioritize competitive gaming and require a higher refresh rate with variable refresh rate support, the LG 32GQ850 with its IPS panel would be more appropriate. The 32GQ850 is also larger and more suitable for productivity due to its screen real estate but won't deliver the same level of color depth and contrast as the OLED monitor. Consider your primary activities, whether they be gaming, media consumption, or productivity, and weigh these against the significant price difference between the two monitors. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Good for media consumption
  • Very good image clarity
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class response time
Advantages of the LG 32GQ850 (IPS)
  • Very good refresh rate

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.5
27EQ850
32GQ850
5.8
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
260Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
150 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is poor.

Productivity

6.6
27EQ850
32GQ850
5.0
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
163 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is only fair for productivity, while the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is poor.

Media Consumption

7.8
27EQ850
32GQ850
5.3
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
150 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$1,997
27EQ850
32GQ850
$718
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

The LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) has a price of $1,997 and the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) costs $718.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
27EQ850
32GQ850
No
The LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

No
27EQ850
32GQ850
Yes
The LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

5.4
27EQ850
32GQ850
5.2
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
260Hz
1.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.0 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 260 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
150 nits
The LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
27EQ850
32GQ850
No
Both the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
27EQ850
32GQ850
Yes
Both the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) and the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED)LG 32GQ850 (IPS)
LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED)LG 32GQ850 (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$1,997
$718
Screen Size
27"32"
Resolution
3840 x 21602560 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDIPS
Local Dimming Zones
N/A16

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:11000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
200 nits150 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
Unknown600 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesNo
sRGB Color Gamut
99 %135 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1 ms8 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
N/A48 - 260 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/108.3/10
Ghosting Score
9.6/107.6/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
163 PPI93 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.9/106.3/10
Image Clarity Score
8/106.3/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
10
HDMI 2.1 Ports
01
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,900
Recommendations made
16,185
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo