If you're looking for exceptional image quality with deep blacks and vibrant colors for HDR gaming and media consumption, the LG 27EP950, with its OLED panel, is an excellent choice despite its premium price. However, it’s not the best for competitive gaming due to lower refresh rates. The LG 32GP850, on the other hand, is more budget-friendly and offers a larger screen size, making it suitable for productivity and casual gaming with its higher refresh rate and variable refresh rate support. Yet, it won't match the OLED's performance in color accuracy and contrast, making it less ideal for high-end content creation and HDR experiences. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED)
Best in class for casual gaming
Good for media consumption
Very good image clarity
Best in class contrast
Best in class response time
Advantages of the LG 32GP850 (IPS)
Good refresh rate
Good brightness
Key differences
Casual Gaming
9.5/10
5.8/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1037:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
430 nits
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
95.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.
Competitive Gaming
5.4/10
4.8/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
1.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
6.2 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 180 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is somewhat better.
Productivity
6.6/10
5.0/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
163 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is only fair for productivity, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
7.9/10
5.5/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1037:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
430 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$3,000
$600
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) has a price of $3,000 and the LG 32GP850 (IPS) costs $600.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
No
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
No
Yes
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing.
Key similarities
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) and the LG 32GP850 (IPS) compare to other monitors
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.