A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
27EP950
Company ProductName Specs




32GP850
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If you're looking for exceptional image quality with deep blacks and vibrant colors for HDR gaming and media consumption, the LG 27EP950, with its OLED panel, is an excellent choice despite its premium price. However, it’s not the best for competitive gaming due to lower refresh rates. The LG 32GP850, on the other hand, is more budget-friendly and offers a larger screen size, making it suitable for productivity and casual gaming with its higher refresh rate and variable refresh rate support. Yet, it won't match the OLED's performance in color accuracy and contrast, making it less ideal for high-end content creation and HDR experiences. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Good for media consumption
  • Very good image clarity
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class response time
Advantages of the LG 32GP850 (IPS)
  • Good refresh rate
  • Good brightness

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.5
27EP950
32GP850
5.8
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1037:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
430 nits
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
95.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.

Competitive Gaming

5.4
27EP950
32GP850
4.8
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
1.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
6.2 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 180 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Productivity

6.6
27EP950
32GP850
5.0
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
163 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is only fair for productivity, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.

Media Consumption

7.9
27EP950
32GP850
5.5
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1037:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
430 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$3,000
27EP950
32GP850
$600
Product image
Product image

$0

$1,000

$2,000

$3,000

$4,000

The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) has a price of $3,000 and the LG 32GP850 (IPS) costs $600.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
27EP950
32GP850
No
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

No
27EP950
32GP850
Yes
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
27EP950
32GP850
No
Both the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

No
27EP950
32GP850
No
Both the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) and the LG 32GP850 (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 27EP950 (W-OLED)LG 32GP850 (IPS)
LG 27EP950 (W-OLED)LG 32GP850 (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$3,000
$600
Screen Size
27"32"
Resolution
3840 x 21602560 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDIPS
Refresh Rate
60Hz180Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:11037:1
SDR Peak Brightness
250 nits412 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
N/A430 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesNo
sRGB Color Gamut
99 %100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1 ms6.2 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
N/A20 - 180 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoYes
Persistence Blur Score
5/107.3/10
Ghosting Score
9.6/108/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
163 PPI93 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.9/106.3/10
Image Clarity Score
8/106.3/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
01
HDMI 2.0 Ports
12
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,900
Recommendations made
16,185
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo