A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
G24-20
Company ProductName Specs




32GS95UE
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 23, 2024·

If you're on a budget and mainly interested in casual or competitive gaming, the Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) is more cost-effective with a decent refresh rate and good gaming performance. However, if you can invest more and are looking for a superior experience in HDR gaming, media consumption, and a larger screen with higher resolution for productivity tasks, the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) offers excellent image quality, a wider color gamut, and better HDR support. Keep in mind, the increased performance and features of the LG come with a higher cost. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Lenovo G24-20 (IPS)
  • The Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) has no clear advantages over the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED).
Advantages of the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Good for productivity
  • Very good for media consumption
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Good image clarity
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class response time

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.7
G24-20
32GS95UE
9.7
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
N/A
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) is poor.

Productivity

4.9
G24-20
32GS95UE
7.0
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
92 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
140 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is good for productivity, while the Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) is poor.

Media Consumption

5.4
G24-20
32GS95UE
8.5
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is very good for media consumption, while the Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$195
G24-20
32GS95UE
$1,200
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

The Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) has a price of $195 and the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) costs $1,200.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
G24-20
32GS95UE
Yes
The Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

5.7
G24-20
32GS95UE
6.2
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
8.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.3 ms
48 - 165 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) to be only fair for competitive gaming, while the Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) is poor.

Digital Photo Editing

No
G24-20
32GS95UE
No
Both the Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) and LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) are not suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
G24-20
32GS95UE
No
Both the Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) and LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
G24-20
32GS95UE
Yes
Both the Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) and LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) and the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Lenovo G24-20 (IPS)LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)
Lenovo G24-20 (IPS)LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$195
$1,200
Screen Size
24"32"
Resolution
1920 x 10803840 x 2160
Screen Type
LEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSW-OLED
Refresh Rate
165Hz240Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1000:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
300 nits275 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
Unknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoYes
sRGB Color Gamut
99 %98.5 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
8 ms0.3 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 165 Hz48 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
7.1/108/10
Ghosting Score
7.6/109.9/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
92 PPI140 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.2/106.9/10
Image Clarity Score
6.2/108/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
20
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,900
Recommendations made
16,185
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo