A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Company ProductName Specs
Company ProductName Specs
What we think
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·
If you're on a tight budget and primarily engage in casual gaming, the Lenovo G24-20 offers a solid experience without a significant investment. However, if you can stretch your budget, the LG 32GP850 delivers a higher resolution, larger screen and better image clarity, making it a better choice for both immersive gaming and productivity tasks. The larger LG monitor also includes features beneficial for gaming like a wider variable refresh rate range and motion blur reduction technology, but both monitors aren't ideal for HDR content due to their limited peak brightness. For digital photo editing, the LG stands out with its superior color accuracy. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Lenovo G24-20 (IPS)
- The Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) has no clear advantages over the LG 32GP850 (IPS).
Advantages of the LG 32GP850 (IPS)
- Good brightness
- Very good response time
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
5.7
4.8
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
8.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
6.2 ms
48 - 165 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 180 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
The Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) is somewhat better.
Cost
$195
$600
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
The Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) has a price of $195 and the LG 32GP850 (IPS) costs $600.
Digital Photo Editing
No
Yes
The Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) is not suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
5.7
5.8
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1037:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
430 nits
N/A
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
95.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GP850 (IPS) and Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) are both poor for casual gaming.
Productivity
4.9
5.0
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
92 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GP850 (IPS) and Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) are both poor for productivity.
Media Consumption
5.4
5.5
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1037:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
430 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GP850 (IPS) and Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) are both poor for media consumption.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) and the LG 32GP850 (IPS) compare to other monitors
Spec Comparison
 |  | |
| Lenovo G24-20 (IPS) | LG 32GP850 (IPS) |
GENERAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | |||
$195 | $600 | ||
Screen Size | |||
Screen Size | 24" | 32" | |
Resolution | |||
Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 2560 x 1440 | |
Screen Type | |||
Screen Type | LED | LED | |
Screen Sub-type | |||
Screen Sub-type | IPS | IPS | |
Refresh Rate | |||
Refresh Rate | 165Hz | 180Hz | |
COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Native Contrast | |||
Native Contrast | 1000:1 | 1037:1 | |
SDR Peak Brightness | |||
SDR Peak Brightness | 300 nits | 412 nits | |
HDR Peak Brightness | |||
HDR Peak Brightness | 430 nits | ||
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | |||
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | No | No | |
sRGB Color Gamut | |||
sRGB Color Gamut | 99 % | 100 % | |
MOTION CHARACTERISTICS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Total Response Time | |||
Total Response Time | 8 ms | 6.2 ms | |
Variable Refresh Rate | |||
Variable Refresh Rate | 48 - 165 Hz | 20 - 180 Hz | |
Strobing / BFI | |||
Strobing / BFI | No | Yes | |
Persistence Blur Score | |||
Persistence Blur Score | 7.1/10 | 7.3/10 | |
Ghosting Score | |||
Ghosting Score | 7.6/10 | 8/10 | |
TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Pixels Per Inch | |||
Pixels Per Inch | 92 PPI | 93 PPI | |
Coating | |||
Coating | Matte | Matte | |
Text Clarity Score | |||
Text Clarity Score | 6.2/10 | 6.3/10 | |
Image Clarity Score | |||
Image Clarity Score | 6.2/10 | 6.3/10 | |
PORTS & CONNECTIVITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
HDMI 1.4 Ports | |||
HDMI 1.4 Ports | 0 | 1 | |
HDMI 2.0 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.0 Ports | 2 | 2 | |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
Micro HDMI Ports | |||
Micro HDMI Ports | 0 | 0 | |
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | |||
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
Give feedback
We're constantly perfecting our model
More comparisons for you
FAQs
Why trust us
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Featured in
