If budget is a concern and you're looking for a monitor with solid performance across various tasks including productivity, casual gaming, and media consumption, the Innocn 32M2V is a cost-effective choice that offers good image clarity and color accuracy. It's suitable for HDR gaming and photo editing with its high brightness and strong color gamut coverage. The ViewSonic XG321UG, on the other hand, provides a higher-quality build with better peak brightness for HDR content and lower response time, which might appeal more to competitive gamers and those prioritizing HDR video editing, but it comes at a premium price. Choose the Innocn for an all-around performance with a softer hit on the wallet or the ViewSonic if you're willing to invest in specialized features such as faster response for competitive gaming at a higher cost. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED)
Good for casual gaming
Best in class for productivity
Good for media consumption
Good contrast
Very good color volume
Advantages of the ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED)
Very good response time
Key differences
Casual Gaming
7.6/10
6.4/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 2160
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
600 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
1200 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1400 nits
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) is good for casual gaming, while the ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) is only fair.
Productivity
9.7/10
7.9/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 2160
139 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
137 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) is best in class for productivity, while the ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) is good.
Media Consumption
7.8/10
6.7/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 2160
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
600 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
1200 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1400 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) is good for media consumption, while the ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) is only fair.
Cost
$800
$2,300
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
The Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) has a price of $800 and the ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) costs $2,300.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
No
The Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for digital photo editing while the ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) is not suitable for digital photo editing.
Key similarities
Competitive Gaming
4.6/10
4.6/10
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
8.3 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
3.6 ms
48 - 144 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48,144 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
600 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
400 nits
The ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) and Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) are both poor for competitive gaming.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) and ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) and ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) are suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) and the ViewSonic XG321UG (IPS Mini LED) compare to other monitors
"Whlie not perfect, the Innocn 32M2V is an excellent HDR gaming monitor if you want a 32″ 4K high refresh rate display – just make sure you’re familiar with all its flaws. If you’ve been waiting for a 32″ 4K high refresh rate gaming monitor with proper HDR support, the Innocn 32M2V is the first model available at a reasonable price."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.