A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Company ProductName Specs
Company ProductName Specs
What we think
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·
If budget is a concern and high-quality HDR performance for gaming and media consumption is important, the Innocn 32M2V could serve you well, but if you're focused on competitive gaming and want the advantage of a higher refresh rate and better response time, the LG 32GQ950 would be more suitable despite its higher cost. While the Innocn offers a better contrast and is suitable for tasks like print photo editing, the LG may offer sharper motion clarity useful in fast-paced games, though it may fall short in HDR display performance. Both have good color accuracy for digital photo editing, so your decision should be based on whether gaming performance or cost and HDR quality are your priorities. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED)
- Good for casual gaming
- Best in class for productivity
- Good for media consumption
- Good contrast
- Good brightness
- Very good color volume
Advantages of the LG 32GQ950 (IPS)
- Good refresh rate
- Very good response time
Key differences
Casual Gaming
7.6
6.2
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
160Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
921:1
600 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
367 nits
1200 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1007 nits
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
94.6 %
Matte
COATING
Semi-Gloss
The Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) is good for casual gaming, while the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is only fair.
Productivity
9.7
8.1
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
139 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
139 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Semi-Gloss
The Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) is best in class for productivity, while the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is very good.
Media Consumption
7.8
6.6
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
921:1
600 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
367 nits
1200 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1007 nits
Matte
COATING
Semi-Gloss
The Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) is good for media consumption, while the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is only fair.
Cost
$800
$930
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
The Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) has a price of $800 and the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) costs $930.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
No
The Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for print photo editing while the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Competitive Gaming
4.6
4.7
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
160Hz
8.3 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
5.8 ms
48 - 144 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 160 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
600 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
367 nits
The LG 32GQ950 (IPS) and Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) are both poor for competitive gaming.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) and LG 32GQ950 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) and LG 32GQ950 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) and the LG 32GQ950 (IPS) compare to other monitors
Spec Comparison
 |  | |
| Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) | LG 32GQ950 (IPS) |
GENERAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | |||
$800 | $930 | ||
Screen Size | |||
Screen Size | 32" | 32" | |
Resolution | |||
Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 | |
Screen Type | |||
Screen Type | MiniLED | LED | |
Screen Sub-type | |||
Screen Sub-type | IPS | IPS | |
Local Dimming Zones | |||
Local Dimming Zones | 1152 | 32 | |
COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Native Contrast | |||
Native Contrast | 1000:1 | 921:1 | |
SDR Peak Brightness | |||
SDR Peak Brightness | 600 nits | 367 nits | |
HDR Peak Brightness | |||
HDR Peak Brightness | 1200 nits | 1007 nits | |
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | |||
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | Yes | No | |
sRGB Color Gamut | |||
sRGB Color Gamut | 100 % | 99.5 % | |
MOTION CHARACTERISTICS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Total Response Time | |||
Total Response Time | 8.3 ms | 5.8 ms | |
Variable Refresh Rate | |||
Variable Refresh Rate | 48 - 144 Hz | 20 - 160 Hz | |
Strobing / BFI | |||
Strobing / BFI | No | No | |
Persistence Blur Score | |||
Persistence Blur Score | 6.6/10 | 7/10 | |
Ghosting Score | |||
Ghosting Score | 7.5/10 | 8.1/10 | |
TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Pixels Per Inch | |||
Pixels Per Inch | 139 PPI | 139 PPI | |
Coating | |||
Coating | Matte | Semi-Gloss | |
Text Clarity Score | |||
Text Clarity Score | 7.9/10 | 7.9/10 | |
Image Clarity Score | |||
Image Clarity Score | 7.9/10 | 7.9/10 | |
PORTS & CONNECTIVITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
HDMI 1.4 Ports | |||
HDMI 1.4 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
HDMI 2.0 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.0 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 2 | 2 | |
Micro HDMI Ports | |||
Micro HDMI Ports | 0 | 0 | |
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | |||
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
Shopping
Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED)
See more
Dig into reviews and images
Display Ninja
Rob Shafer | January 2024
"Whlie not perfect, the Innocn 32M2V is an excellent HDR gaming monitor if you want a 32″ 4K high refresh rate display – just make sure you’re familiar with all its flaws. If you’ve been waiting for a 32″ 4K high refresh rate gaming monitor with proper HDR support, the Innocn 32M2V is the first model available at a reasonable price."
Give feedback
We're constantly perfecting our model
More comparisons for you
Compare Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) vs. KTC M27P20 Pro (IPS MiniLED)
VS
Compare Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) vs. Sony M9 (IPS FALD)
VS
Compare Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) vs. MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED)
VS
Compare LG 32GQ950 (IPS) vs. Asus PG27AQN (IPS)
VS
Compare LG 32GQ950 (IPS) vs. LG 38WN95C (IPS)
VS
Compare LG 32GQ950 (IPS) vs. MSI MPG 321URX (QD-OLED)
VS
FAQs
Why trust us
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Featured in
