A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
M34WQ
Company ProductName Specs




32M2V
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 12, 2024·

If you're focused on immersive gaming and multitasking with a tight budget, the Gigabyte M34WQ with its ultrawide screen and good refresh rate would suit you well. However, it's not the best for HDR gaming and media content. In contrast, the Innocn 32M2V offers a sharper image with its higher resolution, better HDR experience, and superior color accuracy which is great for digital photo editing and print photo editing, but it comes at a higher price. If productivity and high-quality media consumption are priorities and you can invest more, the Innocn 32M2V is a strong choice. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS)
  • The Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) has no clear advantages over the Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED).
Advantages of the Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED)
  • Good for casual gaming
  • Best in class for productivity
  • Good for media consumption
  • Good contrast
  • Good brightness
  • Very good color volume

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.9
M34WQ
32M2V
7.6
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
1074:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
379 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
372 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1200 nits
87.7 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) is good for casual gaming, while the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is poor.

Productivity

6.3
M34WQ
32M2V
9.7
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
110 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
139 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) is best in class for productivity, while the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is only fair.

Media Consumption

6.0
M34WQ
32M2V
7.8
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
1074:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
379 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
372 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1200 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) is good for media consumption, while the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is only fair.

Cost

$330
M34WQ
32M2V
$800
Product image
Product image

$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

The Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) has a price of $330 and the Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) costs $800.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
M34WQ
32M2V
Yes
The Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Print Photo Editing

No
M34WQ
32M2V
Yes
The Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

4.5
M34WQ
32M2V
4.6
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
8.5 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.3 ms
20 - 144 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 144 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
No
379 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
The Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) and Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
M34WQ
32M2V
Yes
Both the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) and Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
M34WQ
32M2V
No
Both the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) and Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) and the Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS)Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED)
Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS)Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED)

GENERAL

Price
$330
$800
Screen Size
34"32"
Resolution
3440 x 14403840 x 2160
Screen Type
LEDMiniLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSIPS
Local Dimming Zones
N/A1152

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1074:11000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
379 nits600 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
372 nits1200 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoYes
sRGB Color Gamut
102.9 %100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
8.5 ms8.3 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 144 Hz48 - 144 Hz
Strobing / BFI
YesNo
Persistence Blur Score
6.6/106.6/10
Ghosting Score
7.5/107.5/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
110 PPI139 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
7.1/107.9/10
Image Clarity Score
7.1/107.9/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
20
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Shopping

Chevron down

Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS)

See more

Dig into reviews and images

Display Ninja

Rob Shafer | November 2023
"If you want a 34″ 3440×1440 ultrawide gaming monitor with a fast response time speed, smooth VRR performance, vibrant colors and crisp details, the Gigabyte M34WQ is one of the best options below $450. Additionally, it has an ergonomic stand, rich connectivity options and plenty of extra features, such as a built-in KVM switch. Some users might not be pleased by its flat screen, but at a certain viewing distance, it feels completely natural."

Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED)

See more

Dig into reviews and images

Display Ninja

Rob Shafer | January 2024
"Whlie not perfect, the Innocn 32M2V is an excellent HDR gaming monitor if you want a 32″ 4K high refresh rate display – just make sure you’re familiar with all its flaws. If you’ve been waiting for a 32″ 4K high refresh rate gaming monitor with proper HDR support, the Innocn 32M2V is the first model available at a reasonable price."

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
108,200
Recommendations made
16,230
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo