If sharp image detail and larger screen size are priorities for work or entertainment, the Gigabyte M28U with its higher resolution will provide a clearer picture, but at a higher cost. It's better suited for productivity and casual gaming. On the other hand, the ViewSonic XG2431 focuses on smooth motion with its higher refresh rate, making it ideal for competitive gaming; however its lower resolution might not be as good for tasks like detailed graphics work. The ViewSonic is also more budget-friendly, so if cost is a concern and gaming performance is a priority, it could be a better choice. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Gigabyte M28U (IPS)
Very good for productivity
Good text clarity
Good image clarity
Advantages of the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS)
Very good refresh rate
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
5.7/10
6.9/10
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
7.7 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
7.5 ms
20 - 144 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 240 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
Yes
312 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
343 nits
The ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the Gigabyte M28U (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
8.8/10
5.0/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
160 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M28U (IPS) is very good for productivity, while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
6.7/10
5.4/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
1228:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
900:1
312 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
343 nits
495 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
507 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M28U (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$470
$245
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
The Gigabyte M28U (IPS) has a price of $470 and the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) costs $245.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
6.1/10
5.8/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1228:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
900:1
312 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
343 nits
495 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
507 nits
65.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
78.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Gigabyte M28U (IPS) to be only fair for casual gaming, while the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) is poor.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Gigabyte M28U (IPS) and ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Gigabyte M28U (IPS) and ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Gigabyte M28U (IPS) and ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Gigabyte M28U (IPS) and ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Gigabyte M28U (IPS) and the ViewSonic XG2431 (IPS) compare to other monitors
"Fundamentally the M28U is an impressive 4K monitor; between the resolution, refresh rate, and IPS panel, it's a great all-rounder for the step up to 4K. Even beyond PC gaming, the inclusion of a HDMI 2.1 port offers 120Hz gaming for consoles, so it's quite the multi-faceted package for its price. Gigabyte has made no major sacrifice to tick all the checkboxes with the M28U."
"The ViewSonic XG2431 is an excellent gaming monitor, especially when used for HDR content. With top-notch video processing and a responsive 240 Hz on tap, it fulfills the needs of competitive players at an attractive price."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,500
Recommendations made
17,625
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.