If you're on a tighter budget, the Gigabyte M28U offers a great value, providing a high resolution and good gaming performance at a lower cost. However, if you favor a larger screen for a more immersive experience in productivity and casual gaming, the Gigabyte M32U, despite the higher expense, might be the better choice. Both models have similar features and performance, but the M32U's larger screen could enhance your experience when using it for work or leisure, although with a higher price tag. Neither is ideal for HDR gaming and media, but both are suitable for digital photo editing due to good color accuracy. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Gigabyte M28U (IPS)
The Gigabyte M28U (IPS) has no clear advantages over the Gigabyte M32U (IPS).
Advantages of the Gigabyte M32U (IPS)
The Gigabyte M32U (IPS) has no clear advantages over the Gigabyte M28U (IPS).
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
5.7/10
4.5/10
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
7.7 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
7.1 ms
20 - 144 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 144 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
Yes
312 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
350 nits
The Gigabyte M28U (IPS) and Gigabyte M32U (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Gigabyte M28U (IPS) is somewhat better.
Productivity
8.8/10
8.0/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
160 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
140 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M28U (IPS) and Gigabyte M32U (IPS) are both very good for productivity, though the Gigabyte M28U (IPS) is somewhat better.
Cost
$470
$650
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
The Gigabyte M28U (IPS) has a price of $470 and the Gigabyte M32U (IPS) costs $650.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
6.1/10
6.2/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
1228:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1125:1
312 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
350 nits
495 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
456 nits
65.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
87.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M32U (IPS) and Gigabyte M28U (IPS) are both only fair for casual gaming.
Media Consumption
6.7/10
6.7/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
1228:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1125:1
312 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
350 nits
495 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
456 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M28U (IPS) and Gigabyte M32U (IPS) are both only fair for media consumption.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Gigabyte M28U (IPS) and Gigabyte M32U (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Gigabyte M28U (IPS) and Gigabyte M32U (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Gigabyte M28U (IPS) and Gigabyte M32U (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Gigabyte M28U (IPS) and Gigabyte M32U (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Gigabyte M28U (IPS) and the Gigabyte M32U (IPS) compare to other monitors
"Fundamentally the M28U is an impressive 4K monitor; between the resolution, refresh rate, and IPS panel, it's a great all-rounder for the step up to 4K. Even beyond PC gaming, the inclusion of a HDMI 2.1 port offers 120Hz gaming for consoles, so it's quite the multi-faceted package for its price. Gigabyte has made no major sacrifice to tick all the checkboxes with the M28U."
"The Gigabyte M32U gaming monitor is almost a slam-dunk choice, considering everything you get as part of the package. Gigabyte goes for broke with things like its built-in KVM switch and GameAssist, and those come close to paying off. Add in the well-executed, more familiar offerings, and this is a monitor that deserves serious thought if you’re in the market for what it delivers."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,500
Recommendations made
17,625
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.