A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Company ProductName Specs
Company ProductName Specs
What we think
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·
If competitive gaming is a priority and you appreciate a quicker response time with a wider variable refresh rate range, the Gigabyte M27Q-X might be the better choice, along with its slightly higher peak brightness which could improve visibility in different lighting conditions. However, if a larger screen size is more important for an immersive gaming and media experience, and you're okay with a slightly lower refresh rate, then the LG 32GP850 features a bigger display which may enhance your gameplay and movie-watching experience. Both are suitable for casual gaming and productivity, but for the more competitive edge, the Gigabyte M27Q-X has advantages. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS)
- Very good for competitive gaming
- Very good refresh rate
- Good text clarity
- Good image clarity
Advantages of the LG 32GP850 (IPS)
- The LG 32GP850 (IPS) has no clear advantages over the Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS).
Key differences
Casual Gaming
6.5
5.8
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
1088:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1037:1
459 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
508 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
430 nits
73.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
95.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) is only fair for casual gaming, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.
Competitive Gaming
8.0
4.8
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
6.8 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
6.2 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 180 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
Yes
459 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
The Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) is very good for competitive gaming, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
6.5
5.0
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) is only fair for productivity, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
6.1
5.5
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
1088:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1037:1
459 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
508 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
430 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$365
$600
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
The Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) has a price of $365 and the LG 32GP850 (IPS) costs $600.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) and the LG 32GP850 (IPS) compare to other monitors
Spec Comparison
 |  | |
| Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) | LG 32GP850 (IPS) |
GENERAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | |||
$365 | $600 | ||
Screen Size | |||
Screen Size | 27" | 32" | |
Resolution | |||
Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 2560 x 1440 | |
Screen Type | |||
Screen Type | LED | LED | |
Screen Sub-type | |||
Screen Sub-type | IPS | IPS | |
Refresh Rate | |||
Refresh Rate | 240Hz | 180Hz | |
COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Native Contrast | |||
Native Contrast | 1088:1 | 1037:1 | |
SDR Peak Brightness | |||
SDR Peak Brightness | 459 nits | 412 nits | |
HDR Peak Brightness | |||
HDR Peak Brightness | 508 nits | 430 nits | |
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | |||
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | No | No | |
sRGB Color Gamut | |||
sRGB Color Gamut | 100.1 % | 100 % | |
MOTION CHARACTERISTICS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Total Response Time | |||
Total Response Time | 6.8 ms | 6.2 ms | |
Variable Refresh Rate | |||
Variable Refresh Rate | 20 - 240 Hz | 20 - 180 Hz | |
Strobing / BFI | |||
Strobing / BFI | Yes | Yes | |
Persistence Blur Score | |||
Persistence Blur Score | 8/10 | 7.3/10 | |
Ghosting Score | |||
Ghosting Score | 8/10 | 8/10 | |
TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Pixels Per Inch | |||
Pixels Per Inch | 109 PPI | 93 PPI | |
Coating | |||
Coating | Matte | Matte | |
Text Clarity Score | |||
Text Clarity Score | 7/10 | 6.3/10 | |
Image Clarity Score | |||
Image Clarity Score | 7/10 | 6.3/10 | |
PORTS & CONNECTIVITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
HDMI 1.4 Ports | |||
HDMI 1.4 Ports | 0 | 1 | |
HDMI 2.0 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.0 Ports | 2 | 2 | |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
Micro HDMI Ports | |||
Micro HDMI Ports | 0 | 0 | |
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | |||
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
Shopping
Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS)
See more
Dig into reviews and images
PC Mag
Zachery Cuevas | August 2022
"The company delivers again with the Gigabyte M27Q X, a 1440p monitor that comes equipped with just about everything you want and need from a gaming monitor. It may not be a 4K panel, but it more than makes up for its lower resolution in performance, bringing a whopping 240Hz refresh rate and a host of unusual features, including an onboard KVM and plenty of ports. It's a great performer, though low brightness levels and a so-so contrast ratio keep it short of top marks."
Give feedback
We're constantly perfecting our model
More comparisons for you
Compare Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) vs. Dell S3221QS (VA)
VS
Compare Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) vs. LG 27GP850 (IPS)
VS
Compare Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) vs. LG 27GP83B (IPS)
VS
Compare LG 32GP850 (IPS) vs. LG 34WQ75C (IPS)
VS
Compare LG 32GP850 (IPS) vs. BenQ XL2566K (TN)
VS
Compare LG 32GP850 (IPS) vs. Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS)
VS
FAQs
Why trust us
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
108,200
Recommendations made
16,230
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Featured in
