If you're interested in competitive gaming with a higher refresh rate and responsive gameplay, the Gigabyte M27Q-X might suit you well, and it's more affordable. However, if you prioritize higher resolution for tasks like photo editing or if a larger screen space is important for productivity, spending more on the Gigabyte M28U could be worthwhile, as it offers a higher resolution. Both monitors have their strengths, but neither is particularly well-suited for HDR gaming or media consumption, so if that is a primary concern, you may want to consider other options. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS)
Very good for competitive gaming
Very good refresh rate
Good brightness
Very good response time
Advantages of the Gigabyte M28U (IPS)
Very good for productivity
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
8.0/10
5.7/10
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
6.8 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
7.7 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 144 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
Yes
459 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
312 nits
The Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) is very good for competitive gaming, while the Gigabyte M28U (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
6.5/10
8.8/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
160 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M28U (IPS) is very good for productivity, while the Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) is only fair.
Media Consumption
6.1/10
6.7/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
1088:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1228:1
459 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
312 nits
508 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
495 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M28U (IPS) and Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) are both only fair for media consumption, though the Gigabyte M28U (IPS) is somewhat better.
Cost
$365
$470
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
The Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) has a price of $365 and the Gigabyte M28U (IPS) costs $470.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing while the Gigabyte M28U (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
6.5/10
6.1/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
1088:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1228:1
459 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
312 nits
508 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
495 nits
73.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
65.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) and Gigabyte M28U (IPS) are both only fair for casual gaming.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) and Gigabyte M28U (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) and Gigabyte M28U (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) and Gigabyte M28U (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) and the Gigabyte M28U (IPS) compare to other monitors
"The company delivers again with the Gigabyte M27Q X, a 1440p monitor that comes equipped with just about everything you want and need from a gaming monitor. It may not be a 4K panel, but it more than makes up for its lower resolution in performance, bringing a whopping 240Hz refresh rate and a host of unusual features, including an onboard KVM and plenty of ports. It's a great performer, though low brightness levels and a so-so contrast ratio keep it short of top marks."
"Fundamentally the M28U is an impressive 4K monitor; between the resolution, refresh rate, and IPS panel, it's a great all-rounder for the step up to 4K. Even beyond PC gaming, the inclusion of a HDMI 2.1 port offers 120Hz gaming for consoles, so it's quite the multi-faceted package for its price. Gigabyte has made no major sacrifice to tick all the checkboxes with the M28U."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,500
Recommendations made
17,625
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.