A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
G24F-2
Company ProductName Specs




DualUp 28MQ780
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 12, 2024·

If you're on a budget and focused on casual or competitive gaming, the Gigabyte G24F-2 with its good refresh rate and response time will provide a smoother experience. However, you'll be sacrificing image clarity and workspace due to its lower screen resolution and size. The LG DualUp, on the other hand, offers a unique vertical screen setup and higher resolution, making it better for productivity tasks like coding or document editing, and its superior color depth and gamut support make it suitable for digital photo editing. It's not ideal for gaming due to its lower refresh rate and lack of variable refresh rate support. If your priority is gaming and price, go for the Gigabyte; if productivity and editing are your main concerns and budget is less of an issue, the LG DualUp could serve you better. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS)
  • Good refresh rate
Advantages of the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS)
  • Good for productivity
  • Good text clarity
  • Good image clarity

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

5.8
G24F-2
DualUp 28MQ780
4.9
170Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
8.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
10.0 ms
48 - 180 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) and LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) is somewhat better.

Productivity

4.9
G24F-2
DualUp 28MQ780
7.7
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 2880
92 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
139 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) is good for productivity, while the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) is poor.

Media Consumption

5.4
G24F-2
DualUp 28MQ780
6.5
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 2880
1100:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$140
G24F-2
DualUp 28MQ780
$650
Product image
Product image

$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

The Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) has a price of $140 and the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) costs $650.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
G24F-2
DualUp 28MQ780
No
The Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing while the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.7
G24F-2
DualUp 28MQ780
5.8
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 2880
170Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
1100:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
95.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) and Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) are both poor for casual gaming.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
G24F-2
DualUp 28MQ780
No
Both the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) and LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
G24F-2
DualUp 28MQ780
Yes
Both the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) and LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
G24F-2
DualUp 28MQ780
No
Both the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) and LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) and the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS)LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS)
Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS)LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$140
$650
Screen Size
24"28"
Resolution
1920 x 10802560 x 2880
Screen Type
LEDLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSIPS
Refresh Rate
170Hz60Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1100:11000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
300 nits300 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoNo
sRGB Color Gamut
125 %100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
8 ms10 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 180 HzN/A
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
7.1/105/10
Ghosting Score
7.6/107.1/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
92 PPI139 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.2/107.9/10
Image Clarity Score
6.2/107.9/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
22
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
10

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,500
Recommendations made
17,625
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo