A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
G24F-2
Company ProductName Specs




38WN95C
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 12, 2024·

If you're looking for an affordable monitor primarily for casual gaming and digital photo editing, the Gigabyte G24F-2 offers a smaller screen and good gaming performance at a budget-friendly price. However, the LG 38WN95C, with its larger and wider screen, better image clarity, and higher resolution, is more suited for productivity tasks, immersive media consumption, and it has higher brightness which improves HDR content viewing. Keep in mind, the LG comes at a premium price, but it provides a more versatile experience for both work and entertainment. If you're focused on competitive gaming, both offer features to support this, but the Gigabyte may have an edge with its response time. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS)
  • Good refresh rate
Advantages of the LG 38WN95C (IPS)
  • Good text clarity
  • Good image clarity
  • Good brightness

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

5.8
G24F-2
38WN95C
4.5
170Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
8.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
7.1 ms
48 - 180 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 144 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
477 nits
The Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) and LG 38WN95C (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) is somewhat better.

Productivity

4.9
G24F-2
38WN95C
6.6
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3840 x 1600
92 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
111 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 38WN95C (IPS) is only fair for productivity, while the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) is poor.

Media Consumption

5.4
G24F-2
38WN95C
6.2
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3840 x 1600
1100:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
898:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
477 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
692 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 38WN95C (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$140
G24F-2
38WN95C
$950
Product image
Product image

$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

The Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) has a price of $140 and the LG 38WN95C (IPS) costs $950.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
G24F-2
38WN95C
No
The Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing while the LG 38WN95C (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.7
G24F-2
38WN95C
6.1
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3840 x 1600
170Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
1100:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
898:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
477 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
692 nits
95.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
94.1 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers LG 38WN95C (IPS) to be only fair for casual gaming, while the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) is poor.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
G24F-2
38WN95C
No
Both the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) and LG 38WN95C (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
G24F-2
38WN95C
Yes
Both the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) and LG 38WN95C (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
G24F-2
38WN95C
No
Both the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) and LG 38WN95C (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) and the LG 38WN95C (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS)LG 38WN95C (IPS)
Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS)LG 38WN95C (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$140
$950
Screen Size
24"38"
Resolution
1920 x 10803840 x 1600
Screen Type
LEDLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSIPS
Local Dimming Zones
N/A4

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1100:1898:1
SDR Peak Brightness
300 nits477 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
Unknown692 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoNo
sRGB Color Gamut
125 %100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
8 ms7.1 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 180 Hz20 - 144 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
7.1/106.6/10
Ghosting Score
7.6/107.9/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
92 PPI111 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.2/107.2/10
Image Clarity Score
6.2/107.2/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
22
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
10

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,500
Recommendations made
17,625
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo