A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
G24F-2
Company ProductName Specs




34WQ73A
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If you're on a budget and prioritize gaming, especially competitive gaming, the Gigabyte G24F-2 provides a good experience at a lower price and is friendly for activities like digital photo editing. However, if productivity and enjoying wider, more immersive visuals in your tasks are more important to you, the LG 34WQ73A's larger, ultrawide screen could be worth the extra investment, also offering better text and image clarity which benefits general media consumption, though it's not ideal for gaming. Both are suitable for print photo editing, but neither is recommended for HDR gaming and media consumption. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS)
  • Good refresh rate
Advantages of the LG 34WQ73A (IPS)
  • Good text clarity
  • Good image clarity

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

5.8
G24F-2
34WQ73A
3.8
170Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
8.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
10.0 ms
48 - 180 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) is somewhat better.

Productivity

4.9
G24F-2
34WQ73A
6.0
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
92 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is only fair for productivity, while the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) is poor.

Media Consumption

5.4
G24F-2
34WQ73A
5.9
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
1100:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 34WQ73A (IPS) and Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) are both poor for media consumption, though the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is somewhat better.

Cost

$140
G24F-2
34WQ73A
$400
Product image
Product image

$0

$100

$200

$300

$400

$500

$600

The Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) has a price of $140 and the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) costs $400.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
G24F-2
34WQ73A
No
The Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is not suitable for digital photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.7
G24F-2
34WQ73A
5.8
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
170Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
1100:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
95.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 34WQ73A (IPS) and Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) are both poor for casual gaming.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
G24F-2
34WQ73A
No
Both the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
G24F-2
34WQ73A
No
Both the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
G24F-2
34WQ73A
Yes
Both the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) and the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS)LG 34WQ73A (IPS)
Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS)LG 34WQ73A (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$140
$400
Screen Size
24"34"
Resolution
1920 x 10803440 x 1440
Screen Type
LEDLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSIPS
Refresh Rate
170Hz60Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1100:11000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
300 nits300 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoNo
sRGB Color Gamut
125 %99 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
8 ms10 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 180 HzN/A
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
7.1/105/10
Ghosting Score
7.6/107.1/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
92 PPI110 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.2/107.1/10
Image Clarity Score
6.2/107.1/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
22
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
10

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,500
Recommendations made
17,625
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo