A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
G24F-2
Company ProductName Specs




27EQ850
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If budget is a major concern and you're looking for good performance in both casual and competitive gaming thanks to its higher refresh rate and response time, then the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) is a suitable option. However, the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) offers superior image clarity, better for HDR gaming and media consumption, and higher resolution for a more premium viewing experience, although its higher price and lower refresh rate may not appeal to competitive gamers. If your focus is on productivity or you enjoy high-quality media, and you're willing to invest more, the LG could be the better choice. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS)
  • Good refresh rate
Advantages of the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Good for media consumption
  • Very good image clarity
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class response time

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.7
G24F-2
27EQ850
9.5
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
170Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
1100:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
200 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
95.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) is poor.

Productivity

4.9
G24F-2
27EQ850
6.6
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
92 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
163 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is only fair for productivity, while the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) is poor.

Media Consumption

5.4
G24F-2
27EQ850
7.8
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
1100:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
200 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$140
G24F-2
27EQ850
$1,997
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

The Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) has a price of $140 and the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) costs $1,997.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
G24F-2
27EQ850
Yes
The Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
G24F-2
27EQ850
No
The Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

5.8
G24F-2
27EQ850
5.4
170Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
8.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
1.0 ms
48 - 180 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
200 nits
The Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) and LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) are both poor for competitive gaming.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
G24F-2
27EQ850
No
Both the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) and LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
G24F-2
27EQ850
Yes
Both the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) and LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) and the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS)LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED)
Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS)LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$140
$1,997
Screen Size
24"27"
Resolution
1920 x 10803840 x 2160
Screen Type
LEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSW-OLED
Refresh Rate
170Hz60Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1100:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
300 nits200 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoYes
sRGB Color Gamut
125 %99 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
8 ms1 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 180 HzN/A
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
7.1/105/10
Ghosting Score
7.6/109.6/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
92 PPI163 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.2/106.9/10
Image Clarity Score
6.2/108/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
21
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
10

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,500
Recommendations made
17,625
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo