A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
FI32Q-X
Company ProductName Specs




32GP850
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If competitive gaming is your priority, the Gigabyte FI32Q-X, with its higher refresh rate, could provide a smoother and more responsive experience. However, if you're looking for a monitor that balances gaming with productivity and cost, the LG 32GP850 is more affordable and still offers a good refresh rate and color accuracy for tasks like digital photo editing. Neither of these monitors is ideal for HDR gaming or media consumption, so if that's a significant part of your use case, you might want to consider other options. The LG is also a suitable choice if you're interested in a monitor with a wider variable refresh rate range to reduce screen tearing during gameplay. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS)
  • Very good refresh rate
Advantages of the LG 32GP850 (IPS)
  • Very good response time

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

5.3
FI32Q-X
32GP850
4.8
270Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
8.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
6.2 ms
48 - 270 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 180 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
The Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) is somewhat better.

Cost

$500
FI32Q-X
32GP850
$600
Product image
Product image

$200

$300

$400

$500

$600

$700

$800

$900

The Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) has a price of $500 and the LG 32GP850 (IPS) costs $600.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.9
FI32Q-X
32GP850
5.8
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
270Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1037:1
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
600 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
430 nits
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
95.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are both poor for casual gaming.

Productivity

4.8
FI32Q-X
32GP850
5.0
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
91 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GP850 (IPS) and Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) are both poor for productivity.

Media Consumption

5.4
FI32Q-X
32GP850
5.5
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1037:1
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
600 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
430 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GP850 (IPS) and Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) are both poor for media consumption.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
FI32Q-X
32GP850
No
Both the Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
FI32Q-X
32GP850
Yes
Both the Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
FI32Q-X
32GP850
No
Both the Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

No
FI32Q-X
32GP850
No
Both the Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS) and the LG 32GP850 (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS)LG 32GP850 (IPS)
Gigabyte FI32Q-X (IPS)LG 32GP850 (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$500
$600
Screen Size
32"32"
Resolution
2560 x 14402560 x 1440
Screen Type
LEDLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSIPS
Local Dimming Zones
16N/A

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1000:11037:1
SDR Peak Brightness
400 nits412 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
600 nits430 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoNo
sRGB Color Gamut
157 %100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
8 ms6.2 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 270 Hz20 - 180 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoYes
Persistence Blur Score
8.5/107.3/10
Ghosting Score
7.6/108/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
91 PPI93 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.1/106.3/10
Image Clarity Score
6.1/106.3/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
01
HDMI 2.0 Ports
02
HDMI 2.1 Ports
20
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,500
Recommendations made
17,625
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo