If you're on a budget and mostly engage in casual gaming or general media consumption, the Dell S3222DGM with its VA panel offers deep contrast and is very cost-effective. However, if you're into competitive gaming or digital photo editing and are willing to invest more, the LG 32GP850 with its IPS panel provides better color accuracy, quicker response times, and smoother motion. The LG also has a slightly higher refresh rate, but keep in mind that both monitors have limitations for HDR gaming and video editing due to their lower HDR peak brightness. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Dell S3222DGM (VA)
Very good contrast
Advantages of the LG 32GP850 (IPS)
Good brightness
Very good response time
Key differences
Casual Gaming
6.9/10
5.8/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
4365:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1037:1
333 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
430 nits
N/A
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
95.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Dell S3222DGM (VA) is only fair for casual gaming, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$250
$600
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
The Dell S3222DGM (VA) has a price of $250 and the LG 32GP850 (IPS) costs $600.
Digital Photo Editing
No
Yes
The Dell S3222DGM (VA) is not suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing.
Key similarities
Competitive Gaming
4.6/10
4.8/10
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
10.6 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
6.2 ms
20 - 165 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 180 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
Yes
333 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
The LG 32GP850 (IPS) and Dell S3222DGM (VA) are both poor for competitive gaming.
Productivity
5.1/10
5.0/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
93 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Dell S3222DGM (VA) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are both poor for productivity.
Media Consumption
5.9/10
5.5/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
4365:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1037:1
333 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
430 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Dell S3222DGM (VA) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are both poor for media consumption.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Dell S3222DGM (VA) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Dell S3222DGM (VA) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Dell S3222DGM (VA) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Dell S3222DGM (VA) and the LG 32GP850 (IPS) compare to other monitors
"Aside from its omission of HDR, the Dell S3222DGM has no flaws of consequence. For a surprisingly low price, it delivers premium quality gaming performance with 165 Hz and Adaptive-Sync through a high-contrast curved VA panel with a wide and accurate color gamut."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,800
Recommendations made
17,670
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.