If budget is a concern and you prioritize high resolution and color accuracy for tasks like photo editing, the Dell S2722QC with its 4K resolution could be a better fit. However, if you're focused on casual to competitive gaming and would benefit from a higher refresh rate and variable refresh rate technology, the LG 32GP850 could enhance your gaming experience. Keep in mind that while the LG offers better gaming performance, its lower resolution might not be as suitable for productivity tasks compared to the Dell's sharper 4K display. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Dell S2722QC (IPS)
Good for productivity
Very good text clarity
Very good image clarity
Advantages of the LG 32GP850 (IPS)
Good refresh rate
Good brightness
Very good response time
Key differences
Productivity
7.9/10
5.0/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
164 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Dell S2722QC (IPS) is good for productivity, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
6.8/10
5.5/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
1304:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1037:1
382 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
402 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
430 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Dell S2722QC (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$400
$600
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
The Dell S2722QC (IPS) has a price of $400 and the LG 32GP850 (IPS) costs $600.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
5.9/10
5.8/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
1304:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1037:1
382 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
402 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
430 nits
82.9 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
95.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Dell S2722QC (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are both poor for casual gaming.
Competitive Gaming
4.9/10
4.8/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
14.4 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
6.2 ms
40 - 60 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 180 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
382 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
The Dell S2722QC (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Dell S2722QC (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Dell S2722QC (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Dell S2722QC (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Dell S2722QC (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Dell S2722QC (IPS) and the LG 32GP850 (IPS) compare to other monitors
"The Dell S2722QC offers 4K, USB-C, HDR, and integrated speakers for a uniquely affordable price, but makes some image quality sacrifices to hit its low cost. It’s a good everyday productivity monitor that you should buy for its features, not its performance."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,800
Recommendations made
17,670
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.