A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
AW2721D
Company ProductName Specs




M27Q-X
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If you're a competitive gamer looking for fast response times and high refresh rates, the Dell Alienware AW2721D would be a solid choice but at a premium price. Conversely, if you're seeking value for money with similar gaming performance and better suitability for print photo editing, the Gigabyte M27Q-X offers that at a midrange price. Neither monitor is ideal for HDR gaming or media consumption. The Alienware's higher price doesn't translate into significantly better performance for productivity or media consumption compared to the Gigabyte, making the latter a more cost-effective option for those use cases as well. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Dell Alienware AW2721D (IPS)
  • The Dell Alienware AW2721D (IPS) has no clear advantages over the Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS).
Advantages of the Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS)
  • Very good response time

Key differences

Chevron down

Cost

$902
AW2721D
M27Q-X
$365
Product image
Product image

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

The Dell Alienware AW2721D (IPS) has a price of $902 and the Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) costs $365.

Print Photo Editing

No
AW2721D
M27Q-X
Yes
The Dell Alienware AW2721D (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

6.5
AW2721D
M27Q-X
6.5
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1088:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1088:1
474 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
459 nits
788 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
508 nits
71.9 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
73.0 %
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
The Dell Alienware AW2721D (IPS) and Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) are both only fair for casual gaming.

Competitive Gaming

8.0
AW2721D
M27Q-X
8.0
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
7.1 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
6.8 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
474 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
459 nits
The Dell Alienware AW2721D (IPS) and Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) are both very good for competitive gaming.

Productivity

6.5
AW2721D
M27Q-X
6.5
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
The Dell Alienware AW2721D (IPS) and Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) are both only fair for productivity.

Media Consumption

6.2
AW2721D
M27Q-X
6.1
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
1088:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1088:1
474 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
459 nits
788 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
508 nits
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
The Dell Alienware AW2721D (IPS) and Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) are both only fair for media consumption.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
AW2721D
M27Q-X
No
Both the Dell Alienware AW2721D (IPS) and Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
AW2721D
M27Q-X
Yes
Both the Dell Alienware AW2721D (IPS) and Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
AW2721D
M27Q-X
No
Both the Dell Alienware AW2721D (IPS) and Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Dell Alienware AW2721D (IPS) and the Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Dell Alienware AW2721D (IPS)Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS)
Dell Alienware AW2721D (IPS)Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$902
$365
Screen Size
27"27"
Resolution
2560 x 14402560 x 1440
Screen Type
LEDLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSIPS
Local Dimming Zones
32N/A

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1088:11088:1
SDR Peak Brightness
474 nits459 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
788 nits508 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoNo
sRGB Color Gamut
136.9 %100.1 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
7.1 ms6.8 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 240 Hz20 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoYes
Persistence Blur Score
8/108/10
Ghosting Score
7.9/108/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
109 PPI109 PPI
Coating
Semi-GlossMatte
Text Clarity Score
7/107/10
Image Clarity Score
7/107/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
22
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Shopping

Chevron down

Dell Alienware AW2721D (IPS)

See more

Dig into reviews and images

PC Mag

Chris Stobing | July 2021
"If cost isn't an issue and you want a gaming monitor that will give your content all-new life for years to come, the Alienware 27 Gaming Monitor defines the upper echelon of what gaming monitors do best today. This display does everything the HP Omen X 27 tried to do, but does it a whole lot better for just a slight bump in price. If you're choosing between the two, the Alienware is the clear winner, and that story repeats itself again and again no matter which 1440p contender we put the Alienware 27 up against."

Gigabyte M27Q-X (IPS)

See more

Dig into reviews and images

PC Mag

Zachery Cuevas | August 2022
"The company delivers again with the Gigabyte M27Q X, a 1440p monitor that comes equipped with just about everything you want and need from a gaming monitor. It may not be a 4K panel, but it more than makes up for its lower resolution in performance, bringing a whopping 240Hz refresh rate and a host of unusual features, including an onboard KVM and plenty of ports. It's a great performer, though low brightness levels and a so-so contrast ratio keep it short of top marks."

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,800
Recommendations made
17,670
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo