A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
45WQHD240
Company ProductName Specs




G274QPF-QD
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If you prioritize high refresh rates, superior contrast, and immersive gaming with vibrant colors, the Corsair monitor with its W-OLED panel is a great choice for both casual and competitive gaming, as well as HDR gaming and media consumption. However, its high price reflects this top-tier performance. On the other hand, the MSI monitor is more budget-friendly, also suitable for gaming and digital photo editing with a decent refresh rate, but won't deliver the same level of picture quality for HDR content. Its IPS panel offers good color accuracy, beneficial for tasks like print photo editing, with a more versatile stand. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED)
  • Very good for casual gaming
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Best in class contrast
  • Excellent response time
Advantages of the MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS)
  • The MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) has no clear advantages over the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED).

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

8.1
45WQHD240
G274QPF-QD
5.9
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
170Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
141 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
632 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
97.6 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
95.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) is very good for casual gaming, while the MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) is poor.

Productivity

3.9
45WQHD240
G274QPF-QD
6.0
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
84 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
108 PPI
No
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) is only fair for productivity, while the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) is poor.

Cost

$1,700
45WQHD240
G274QPF-QD
$270
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

The Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) has a price of $1,700 and the MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) costs $270.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
45WQHD240
G274QPF-QD
No
The Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Print Photo Editing

No
45WQHD240
G274QPF-QD
Yes
The Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

5.4
45WQHD240
G274QPF-QD
5.8
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
170Hz
1.6 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.0 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 170 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
141 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) and Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) are both poor for competitive gaming.

Media Consumption

5.7
45WQHD240
G274QPF-QD
5.9
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
141 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
632 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) and Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) are both poor for media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
45WQHD240
G274QPF-QD
Yes
Both the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) and MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
45WQHD240
G274QPF-QD
No
Both the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) and MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) and the MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED)MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS)
Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED)MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$1,700
$270
Screen Size
45"27"
Resolution
3440 x 14402560 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDIPS
Refresh Rate
240Hz170Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:11000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
141 nits300 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
632 nitsUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesNo
sRGB Color Gamut
99.6 %154 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1.6 ms8 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 240 Hz48 - 170 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/107.1/10
Ghosting Score
9.3/107.6/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
84 PPI108 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
4/107/10
Image Clarity Score
5.1/107/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
02
HDMI 2.1 Ports
20
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,800
Recommendations made
17,670
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo