If high-quality HDR gaming and media consumption are your priorities and you’re willing to invest in a premium product, the Corsair with its excellent color depth and wide color gamut, might suit you. However, its larger size and ultrawide aspect might not be ideal for competitive gaming where a higher response time is essential. In contrast, the KTC offers a good balance for both productivity and gaming at a more affordable price. It has a strong contrast ratio and is well-suited for photo editing tasks with its high AdobeRGB coverage. If you need an adjustable stand, the KTC comes with one, unlike the Corsair. Remember that while the KTC does well in various use cases, the Corsair specializes in delivering higher HDR peak brightness, benefitting immersive media experiences. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED)
Very good refresh rate
Best in class contrast
Excellent response time
Advantages of the KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED)
Best in class for casual gaming
Good for productivity
Very good for media consumption
Good text clarity
Good image clarity
Good brightness
Very good color volume
Key differences
Casual Gaming
8.1/10
9.5/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
165Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
4000:1
141 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
500 nits
632 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1200 nits
97.6 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
93.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) is very good.
Competitive Gaming
5.4/10
6.1/10
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
165Hz
1.6 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
3.0 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 165 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
141 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
500 nits
The KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) is poor.
Productivity
3.9/10
7.1/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
84 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
No
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) is good for productivity, while the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) is poor.
Media Consumption
5.7/10
8.6/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
4000:1
141 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
500 nits
632 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1200 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) is very good for media consumption, while the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) is poor.
Cost
$1,700
$500
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
The Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) has a price of $1,700 and the KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) costs $500.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing while the KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
Yes
Both the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) and KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) and KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) and the KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED) compare to other monitors
"The KTC M27T20 brings mini-LED and HDR1000 features to much more affordable price levels than before. It cuts some corners, however, and the settings require a lot of tuning for optimal colors and black levels."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,800
Recommendations made
17,670
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.