If competitive gaming is your priority and you're willing to invest more, the Asus XB273U F would be a superior choice with a higher refresh rate and faster response time, enhancing smooth gameplay. However, for casual gaming, media consumption, or productivity, the more affordably priced LG 32GP850 would suffice, offering a larger screen size for an immersive experience, though with a slightly lower refresh rate and response time that may not match the performance needed for high-level competitive play. Both monitors support a wide color gamut for photo editing, but neither is ideal for HDR gaming or video editing. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus XB273U F (IPS)
Good for casual gaming
Best in class for competitive gaming
Best in class refresh rate
Good text clarity
Good image clarity
Advantages of the LG 32GP850 (IPS)
The LG 32GP850 (IPS) has no clear advantages over the Asus XB273U F (IPS).
Key differences
Casual Gaming
7.0/10
5.8/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
360Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
1242:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1037:1
488 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
468 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
430 nits
96.1 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
95.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus XB273U F (IPS) is good for casual gaming, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.
Competitive Gaming
9.5/10
4.8/10
360Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
5.4 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
6.2 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 180 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
Yes
488 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
The Asus XB273U F (IPS) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
6.7/10
5.0/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus XB273U F (IPS) is only fair for productivity, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
6.3/10
5.5/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
1242:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1037:1
488 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
468 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
430 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus XB273U F (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$1,100
$600
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
The Asus XB273U F (IPS) has a price of $1,100 and the LG 32GP850 (IPS) costs $600.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Asus XB273U F (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Asus XB273U F (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Asus XB273U F (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Asus XB273U F (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Asus XB273U F (IPS) and the LG 32GP850 (IPS) compare to other monitors
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,500
Recommendations made
17,625
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.