A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
PG34WCDM
Company ProductName Specs




45GR95QE-B
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If you prioritize competitive gaming and want the best performance with fast response times and minimal ghosting, the Asus PG34WCDM stands out. However, this comes at the tradeoff of lesser productivity performance. The LG 45GR95QE-B offers a larger screen, which might be better for immersive gaming and media consumption, but its overall gaming performance and text clarity fall short compared to the Asus. The LG may also appeal for casual gaming and offers a slightly lower price point, but keep in mind that its image clarity isn't as good as the Asus. Both are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption, but if the absolute best gaming performance is critical, the Asus may be worth the extra cost. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Good for media consumption
  • Good image clarity
  • Best in class response time
Advantages of the LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED)
  • The LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) has no clear advantages over the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED).

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.5
PG34WCDM
45GR95QE-B
7.8
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
238 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
203 nits
716 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
665 nits
96.6 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
96.9 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) is good.

Productivity

5.7
PG34WCDM
45GR95QE-B
3.9
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
84 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) and LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) are both poor for productivity, though the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Media Consumption

7.5
PG34WCDM
45GR95QE-B
5.7
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
238 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
203 nits
716 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
665 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) is poor.

Cost

$1,300
PG34WCDM
45GR95QE-B
$1,700
Product image
Product image

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

The Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) has a price of $1,300 and the LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) costs $1,700.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

5.6
PG34WCDM
45GR95QE-B
5.3
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1.1 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
2.7 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 240 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
No
238 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
203 nits
The Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) and LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) are both poor for competitive gaming.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
PG34WCDM
45GR95QE-B
Yes
Both the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) and LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
PG34WCDM
45GR95QE-B
Yes
Both the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) and LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
PG34WCDM
45GR95QE-B
No
Both the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) and LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

No
PG34WCDM
45GR95QE-B
No
Both the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) and LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) are not suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) and the LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED)LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED)
Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED)LG 45GR95QE-B (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,300
$1,700
Screen Size
34"45"
Resolution
3440 x 14403440 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDW-OLED
Refresh Rate
240Hz240Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
238 nits203 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
716 nits665 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %99.9 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1.1 ms2.7 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 240 Hz20 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
YesNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/108/10
Ghosting Score
9.6/108.6/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
109 PPI84 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.6/104/10
Image Clarity Score
7/105.1/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
00
HDMI 2.1 Ports
22
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,500
Recommendations made
17,625
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo